scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Tempest in a teapot: A systematic review of HPV vaccination and risk compensation research

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
None of the studies of sexual behaviors and/or biological outcomes found evidence of riskier behaviors or higher rates of STIs after HPV vaccination, which should be reassuring to parents and health care providers.
Abstract
There has been some concern among parents and in the media that vaccinating children against human papillomavirus could be seen as giving children permission to engage in risky sexual behaviors (also known as sexual disinhibition). Several studies have found this concern to be unfounded but there have been no attempts to synthesize the relevant studies in order to assess if there is evidence of sexual disinhibition. The aim of this study was to synthesize recent literature examining sexual behaviors and biological outcomes (e.g., sexually transmitted infections) post-HPV vaccination. We reviewed literature from January 1, 2008-June 30, 2015 using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase with the following search terms: [(sex behavior OR sex behavior OR sexual) AND (human papillomavirus OR HPV) AND (vaccines OR vaccine OR vaccination)] followed by a cited reference search. We included studies that examined biological outcomes and reported behaviors post-vaccination in both males and females. Studies were reviewed by title and abstract and relevant studies were examined as full-text articles. We identified 2,503 articles and 20 were eventually included in the review. None of the studies of sexual behaviors and/or biological outcomes found evidence of riskier behaviors or higher rates of STIs after HPV vaccination. Instead, the studies found that vaccinated compared to unvaccinated individuals were less likely to report vaginal intercourse without a condom (OR = 0.5; 95%CI = 0.4-0.6) and non-use of contraception (OR = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.15-0.48) and unvaccinated participants had higher rates of Chlamydia (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.06-5.00). These results should be reassuring to parents and health care providers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Addressing HPV vaccine myths: practical information for healthcare providers

TL;DR: Five key myths about HPV vaccination are addressed – HPV vaccination is not effective at preventing cancer; Pap smears are sufficient to prevent cervical cancer; HPV vaccine is not safe; HPV vaccinations is not needed since most infections are naturally cleared by the immune system; 11–12 years of age is too young to vaccinate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk Compensation and COVID-19 Vaccines.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the Peltzman effect, a phenomenon in which individuals respond to safety measures with a compensatory increase in risky behavior, and how it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic through "pandemic fatigue" and post vaccination behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI

Including males in Canadian human papillomavirus vaccination programs: a policy analysis

TL;DR: The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for females aged 9–26 years (bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine) and males aged 9- 26 years (quadrivalent Vaccine).
Journal ArticleDOI

Missed opportunities for catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination among university undergraduates: Identifying health decision-making behaviors and uptake barriers.

TL;DR: Encouraging conversations with doctors and/or parents/guardians were identified as one of the most influential factors to increase vaccine uptake and interventions for this population should work to increase students' control over decision-making while also addressing parental concerns.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Book

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Journal Article

Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

TL;DR: The first statement by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on the use of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was made by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on June 8, 2006 as mentioned in this paper.
Related Papers (5)