Open AccessBook
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Julian P T Higgins,Sally Green +1 more
TLDR
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.Abstract:
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P T Higgins,Douglas G. Altman,Peter C Gøtzsche,Peter Jüni,David Moher,Andrew D Oxman,Jelena Savović,Kenneth F. Schulz,Laura Weeks,Jonathan A C Sterne +9 more
TL;DR: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
Larissa Shamseer,David Moher,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G. Shekelle,Lesley A. Stewart +7 more
TL;DR: The PRISMA-P checklist as mentioned in this paper provides 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol, as well as a model example from an existing published protocol.
Journal ArticleDOI
A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Maria J. Grant,Andrew Booth +1 more
TL;DR: Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive, but this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
Journal ArticleDOI
Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic
Colin Hill,Francisco Guarner,Gregor Reid,Glenn R. Gibson,Daniel Merenstein,Bruno Pot,Lorenzo Morelli,Roberto Berni Canani,Harry J. Flint,Seppo Salminen,Philip C. Calder,Mary Ellen Sanders +11 more
TL;DR: An expert panel was convened in October 2013 by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) to discuss the field of probiotics and the appropriate use and scope of the term probiotic.
References
More filters
Book
Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
TL;DR: The Discovery of Grounded Theory as mentioned in this paper is a book about the discovery of grounded theories from data, both substantive and formal, which is a major task confronting sociologists and is understandable to both experts and laymen.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Hilary Arksey,Lisa O'Malley +1 more
TL;DR: A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.