scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Ana Barac published in 2017"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recommendations for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult-onset cancers were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using a systematic review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical experience.
Abstract: Purpose Cardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of certain cancer-directed therapies that can interfere with the efficacy of treatment, decrease quality of life, or impact the actual survival of the patient with cancer. The purpose of this effort was to develop recommendations for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult-onset cancers. Methods Recommendations were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using a systematic review (1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical experience. Study quality was assessed using established methods, per study design. The guideline recommendations were crafted in part using the Guidelines Into Decision Support methodology. Results A total of 104 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. The strength of the recommendations in these guidelines is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms. Recommendations It is important for health care providers to initiate the discussion regarding the potential for cardiac dysfunction in individuals in whom the risk is sufficiently high before beginning therapy. Certain higher risk populations of survivors of cancer may benefit from prevention and screening strategies implemented during cancer-directed therapies. Clinical suspicion for cardiac disease should be high and threshold for cardiac evaluation should be low in any survivor who has received potentially cardiotoxic therapy. For certain higher risk survivors of cancer, routine surveillance with cardiac imaging may be warranted after completion of cancer-directed therapy, so that appropriate interventions can be initiated to halt or even reverse the progression of cardiac dysfunction.

782 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is a need for future studies focused on prospective identification of biomarkers and clinical standards for treatment and long-term follow-up of cardiovascular toxicity to successfully continue the treatment of cancer while preventing the adverse outcomes with novel immune therapies.
Abstract: Immune therapies represent a quantum leap in the fight against cancer. Recently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors that target receptors involved in immune escape of cancer cells (including cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) are increasingly being used for therapeutic benefit in a number of cancers. The robust anti-cancer activity of these agents has been accompanied by the recognition of new adverse effects, often due to the over activation of immune system, that may limit their therapeutic benefit and adversely impact outcomes. Combination treatments in particular, such as approaches using two targeted immunotherapy agents, have higher risk of adverse effects. Our review focuses on the approved checkpoint inhibitor therapies and their potential for cardiovascular toxicity. While very few cases of autoimmune cardiotoxicity and myocarditis have been reported in clinical trials, severe, life-threatening episodes of heart failure and hemodynamic compromise associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently been reported in the literature. Early recognition, diagnosis, and management of autoimmune myocarditis represent an important clinical challenge with no current guidelines available for prevention, identification, and treatment of this serious condition. This area of cardio-oncology is evolving rapidly as more drugs in this class are being discovered and pending approval. There is a need for future studies focused on prospective identification of biomarkers and clinical standards for treatment and long-term follow-up of cardiovascular toxicity to successfully continue the treatment of cancer while preventing the adverse outcomes with novel immune therapies.

72 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This state of the art review summarizes the present knowledge about the mechanisms and clinical practices of screening, diagnosis, and management of LV dysfunction associated with cancer therapeutic regimens and utilizes the framework of the ACCF/AHA stages of heart failure to summarize current evidence for risk stratification and modification.
Abstract: Contemporary cancer therapies have dramatically improved cancer-free and overall survival but have been accompanied by increasing cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity, including left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Previously, systemic chemotherapy with anthracyclines and radiation therapy were the only cancer treatments with significant cardiotoxicity. However, modern targeted cancer therapies, including HER2 inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), proteasome inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have all been associated with adverse cardiovascular events. As cancer treatment paradigms successfully move toward prolonged targeted therapy, cardiologists are increasingly needed to assess cardiotoxicity risk and manage asymptomatic and symptomatic LV systolic dysfunction. This state of the art review summarizes the present knowledge about the mechanisms and clinical practices of screening, diagnosis, and management of LV dysfunction associated with cancer therapeutic regimens. We utilize the framework of the ACCF/AHA stages of heart failure (HF) to summarize current evidence for risk stratification and modification (Stage A HF), asymptomatic structural heart disease detection and treatment (Stage B HF), and reduction of HF morbidity and mortality (Stages C and D HF) during cancer treatment and in survivorship. We also present new clinical practice challenges and opportunities for active engagement of cardiologists with multidisciplinary cancer treatment teams in order to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

40 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The SAFE-HEaRt study is the first clinical trial that prospectively tests the hypothesis that HER2 targeted therapies may be safely administered in patients with mildly reduced cardiac function in the setting of ongoing cardiac treatment and monitoring.
Abstract: Background Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies have survival benefit in adjuvant and metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer but are associated with cardiac dysfunction. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations limit the use of HER2 targeted agents to patients with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Methods The objective of the SAFE-HEaRt study is to evaluate the cardiac safety of HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with optimized cardiac therapy. Thirty patients with histologically confirmed HER2 positive breast cancer (stage I-IV) and reduced LVEF (40% to 49%) who plan to receive HER2 targeted therapy for ≥3 months will be enrolled. Prior to initiation on study, optimization of heart function with beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors will be initiated. Patients will be followed by serial echocardiograms and cardiac visits during and 6 months after completion of HER2 targeted therapy. Myocardial strain and blood biomarkers, including cardiac troponin I and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, will be examined at baseline and during the study. Discussion LV dysfunction in patients with breast cancer poses cardiac and oncological challenges and limits the use of HER2 targeted therapies and its oncological benefits. Strategies to prevent cardiac dysfunction associated with HER2 targeted therapy have been limited to patients with normal LVEF, thus excluding patients who may receive the highest benefit from those strategies. SAFE-HEaRt is the first prospective pilot study of HER2 targeted therapies in patients with reduced LV function while on optimized cardiac treatment that can provide the basis for clinical practice changes. The Oncologist 2017;22:518-525 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies have survival benefit in adjuvant and metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer but are associated with cardiac dysfunction. To our knowledge, SAFE-HEaRt is the first clinical trial that prospectively tests the hypothesis that HER2 targeted therapies may be safely administered in patients with mildly reduced cardiac function in the setting of ongoing cardiac treatment and monitoring. The results of this study will provide cardiac safety data and inform consideration of clinical practice changes in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer and reduced cardiac function, as well as provide information regarding cardiovascular monitoring and treatment in this population.

32 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy was associated with a lower risk of heart failure and fracture compared to continuous androgens deprivation therapy, which raises toxicity concerns for continuous relative to intermittent therapy and suggests that intermittent androgen deprived therapy may represent a safer therapeutic choice in elderly men with advanced prostate cancer.

19 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current knowledge about EGFR/ErbB/HER receptor-targeted cancer therapeutics focusing on their cardiotoxicity profiles, molecular mechanisms, and implications in clinical cardio-oncology are summarized.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: BC survivors may not understand how their separate, yet cumulative, health issues can impact their CV risk, and patient-provider communication on behavioral risk factor modification and CV risk is needed, particularly among at-risk subgroups such as AA and obese BC survivors.

4 citations


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: This chapter discusses how the partnership of these two medical subspecialties in the future will improve outcomes for cancer patients.
Abstract: With the availability of new and very effective therapies, cancer has increasingly become a chronic condition and led to the need for close collaboration between the specialties of oncology and cardiology. Collaboration is developing in the clinic, research, and training arenas and has drawn the attention of major national and international cardiology and oncology associations to the field of cardio-oncology. This chapter discusses how the partnership of these two medical subspecialties in the future will improve outcomes for cancer patients.