scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrei Shleifer

Researcher at Harvard University

Publications -  519
Citations -  286543

Andrei Shleifer is an academic researcher from Harvard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Government & Shareholder. The author has an hindex of 171, co-authored 514 publications receiving 271880 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrei Shleifer include National Bureau of Economic Research & University of Chicago.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Coase and corporate governance in latin america

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use the Coasian idea that private contracts can attain efficient efficiency in international contracts and make it easier for the private sector to write its own efficient contracts.
Posted Content

The Unofficial Economy in Africa

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the productivity of informal firms (those that are not registered with the government) in 24 African countries using field work and World Bank firm level data, and find that productivity jumps sharply if they compare small formal firms to informal firms, and rises rapidly with the size of formal firms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Disclosure by Politicians

TL;DR: In this article, the authors collected data on the rules and practices of financial and conflict disclosure by politicians in 175 countries and found that disclosure is correlated with lower perceived corruption when it is public, when it identifies sources of income and conflicts of interest, and when a country is a democracy.
Posted Content

Pervasive Shortages Under Socialism

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a new theory of pervasive shortages under socialism, based on the assumption that the planners are self-interested, meaning that it is in their interest to create shortages of output and to collect bribes from the rationed consumers.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Guarantees of Freedom

TL;DR: In this article, the authors created a data base of constitutional rules in 71 countries that reflect these institutions of English and American freedom, and ask whether these rules predict economic and political freedom in a cross-section of countries.