The immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary adhesives is quite favorable, regardless of the approach used. In the long term, the bonding effectiveness of some adhesives drops dramatically, whereas the bond strengths of other adhesives are more stable. This review examines the fundamental processes that cause the adhesion of biomaterials to enamel and dentin to degrade with time. Non-carious class V clinical trials remain the ultimate test method for the assessment of bonding effectiveness, but in addition to being high-cost, they are time- and labor-consuming, and they provide little information on the true cause of clinical failure. Therefore, several laboratory protocols were developed to predict bond durability. This paper critically appraises methodologies that focus on chemical degradation patterns of hydrolysis and elution of interface components, as well as mechanically oriented test set-ups, such as fatigue and fracture toughness measurements. A correlation of in vitro and in vivo data revealed that, currently, the most validated method to assess adhesion durability involves aging of micro-specimens of biomaterials bonded to either enamel or dentin. After about 3 months, all classes of adhesives exhibited mechanical and morphological evidence of degradation that resembles in vivo aging effects. A comparison of contemporary adhesives revealed that the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives remain the 'gold standard' in terms of durability. Any kind of simplification in the clinical application procedure results in loss of bonding effectiveness. Only the two-step self-etch adhesives approach the gold standard and do have some additional clinical benefits.

http://www.endoexperience.com/documents/DeMunketalDurabiltyofadhesionJDR.pdf

A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results

Bonding to tooth tissue can be achieved through an "etch&rinse," "self-etch" or "glass-ionomer" approach. In this paper, the basic bonding mechanism to enamel and dentin of these three approaches is demonstrated by means of ultramorphological and chemical characterization of tooth-biomaterial interfacial interactions. Furthermore, bond-strength testing and measurement of marginal-sealing effectiveness (the two most commonly employed methodologies to determine "bonding effectiveness" in the laboratory) are evaluated upon their value and relevance in predicting clinical performance. A new dynamic methodology to test biomaterial-tooth bonds in a fatigue mode is introduced with a recently developed micro-rotary fatigue-testing device. Eventually, today's adhesives will be critically weighted upon their performance in diverse laboratory studies and clinical trials. Special attention has been given to the benefits/drawbacks of an etch&rinse versus a self-etch approach and the long-term performance of these adhesives. Correlating data gathered in the laboratory with clinical results clearly showed that laboratory research CAN predict clinical effectiveness. Although there is a tendency to simplify bonding procedures, the data presented confirm that conventional three-step etch&rinse adhesives still perform most favorably and are most reliable in the long-term. Nevertheless, a self-etch approach may have the best future perspective. Clinically, when adhesives no longer require an "etch&rinse" step, the application time, and probably more importantly, the technique-sensitivity are substantially reduced. Especially "mild," two-step self-etch adhesives that bond through a combined micromechanical and chemical interaction with tooth tissue closely approach conventional three-step systems in bonding performance.

Buonocore memorial lecture, adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges

Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives

Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface

http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/odontologia/robertramirez/PDF/1.pdf

State of the art of self-etch adhesives

Effect of resin and photoinitiator on color, translucency and color stability of conventional and low-shrinkage model composites

Importance of tetragonal phase in high-translucent partially stabilized zirconia for dental restorations.

PURPOSE Universal adhesives use a combined primer/bonding resin applied either in 2-step etch-and-rinse (2-E&R) or 1-step self-etch (1-SE) mode. This study investigated whether three universal adhesives would benefit from an extra bonding layer (EBL), essentially making them 3-step E&R (3-E&R) and 2-SE adhesives, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS Microtensile bond strengths (μTBSs) to bur-cut dentin of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (C-UBq, Kuraray Noritake), G-Premio Bond (G-PrB, GC) and Prime&Bond Active (P&Ba, Dentsply Sirona) were compared to those of the 2-SEa Clearfil SE Bond 2 (C-SE2, Kuraray Noritake) which was also employed in 3-E&R mode. A split-tooth design was applied with each adhesive used in E&R and SE mode on each tooth, half without/with EBL (C-SE2 Bond). All adhesives were light cured after application of the final layer. The μTBS of one-third of the specimens was measured after 1-month water storage without thermocycling (TC), with the remaining two-thirds aged with 25,000 and 50,000 TCs. All μTBSs were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with specific contrasts (p < 0.05). RESULTS Overall, the four variables (adhesive, bonding mode, EBL, aging) significantly influenced μTBS. Solely G-PrB benefited from EBL when applied in SE mode. In E&R mode, P&Ba generally resulted in the highest µTBSs, C-UBq presented with intermediate and G-PrB with the lowest µTBSs, where the latter was significantly lower than the µTBSs recorded for C-SE2. In SE mode, P&Ba generally resulted in the highest µTBSs in 1- and 2-SE mode. Equally high µTBSs were recorded for G-PrB in 2-SE mode with EBL. Lower µTBSs were recorded for G-PrB in 1-SE mode and for C-UBq in 1- and 2-SE mode. CONCLUSION The overall effect of EBL on immediate and aged bonding efficacy depended on the specific universal adhesive and its bonding mode.

Do Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Bonding Layer

Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth.

INTRODUCTION ADHESIVE DENTISTRY • Indications for Use of Adhesives • Advantages of Bonding Techniques • Mechanism of Adhesion • Factors Affecting Adhesion ENAMEL BONDING • Steps for Enamel Bonding • Mechanism of Etching DENTIN BONDING • Conditioning of Dentin • Priming of Dentin • Moist vs Dry Dentin DENTIN BONDING AGENT • Mechanism of Bonding • Evolution of Dentin Bonding Agents • Nanofilled Bonding Agents HYBRID LAYER AND HYBRIDIZATION • Hybridization (Given by Nakabayachi in 1982) • Zones of Hybrid Layer SMEAR LAYER • Structure • Formation of Smear Layer • Components of Smear Layer • Role of Smear Layer • Role of Smear Layer in Dentin Bonding • Classification of Modern Adhesives GLASS IONOMER BASED ADHESIVE SYSTEM • Steps FAILURE OF DENTIN BONDING

Bart Van Meerbeek

Papers

Effect of resin and photoinitiator on color, translucency and color stability of conventional and low-shrinkage model composites

Importance of tetragonal phase in high-translucent partially stabilized zirconia for dental restorations.

Do Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Bonding Layer

Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth.

Bonding to enamel and dentin