E
Elsebeth Lynge
Researcher at University of Copenhagen
Publications - 484
Citations - 19048
Elsebeth Lynge is an academic researcher from University of Copenhagen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 59, co-authored 461 publications receiving 17055 citations. Previous affiliations of Elsebeth Lynge include Statens Serum Institut & Karolinska Institutet.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Regional Trends in Incidence of Cervical Cancer in Denmark in Relation to Local Smear-Taking Activity
TL;DR: The observed pattern gives further evidence of a decline in the incidence of cervical cancer following the introduction of pap smears, but future trends should be kept under close surveillance.
Journal Article
Employment as hairdresser and risk of ovarian cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas among women
TL;DR: It is strongly suggested that occupational cancer risk among female hairdressers depends on temporal and geographical factors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Patterns of cervical coinfection with multiple human papilloma virus types in a screening population in Denmark.
Bryan Goldman,Matejka Rebolj,Carsten Rygaard,Sarah Preisler,Ditte Møller Ejegod,Elsebeth Lynge,Jesper Bonde +6 more
TL;DR: Simulation results suggest some interaction between HPV types, and suggest that common risk factors do not entirely explain the observed HPV coinfection pattern, although no evidence is found that the prevalence of any types not targeted by the quadrivalent vaccine may be indirectly increased or decreased after widespread use of the vaccine.
Journal ArticleDOI
European directive on confidential data: a threat to epidemiology.
TL;DR: Two studies on the relation between growth in utero and serum cholesterol concentration in adult life and mortality from cardiovascular disease are published, potentially under threat from a proposed European Union directive on confidential data.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mortality of non-participants in cervical screening: Register-based cohort study.
TL;DR: Non‐participants in cervical screening had substantially higher all‐cause mortality than participants, and a particularly increased risk of HPV‐related causes of death, which indicates that improper control for the selective uptake of cervical screening may result in overestimating its effectiveness.