I
Ian Phillips
Researcher at University College London
Publications - 263
Citations - 12780
Ian Phillips is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gene & Complementary DNA. The author has an hindex of 55, co-authored 260 publications receiving 12208 citations. Previous affiliations of Ian Phillips include University of London & Queen Mary University of London.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Outbreak of hospital infection caused by contaminated autoclaved fluids
TL;DR: The source of the outbreak was softened, deionised, and distilled water manufactured in the pharmacy and widely used throughout the hospital, resulting in general contamination of the machines and colonisation of patients' respiratory tracts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Flavin-containing monooxygenases: mutations, disease and drug response.
TL;DR: This work focuses on the three FMOs (FMOs 1, 2 and 3) that are most important for metabolism of foreign chemicals in humans, and describes the mechanism of action and insights gained from the structure of yeast FMO.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cell-, tissue-, sex- and developmental stage-specific expression of mouse flavin-containing monooxygenases (Fmos)
TL;DR: RNase protection assays showed that the most abundant isoform in newborn liver, lung, kidney and brain, and in adult lung and kidney is FMO1, but in adult liver FMO5 is present in greatest amounts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Necrobacillosis: a forgotten disease.
TL;DR: Over four years five previously healthy young adults developed necrobacillosis, a severe septicaemic illness caused by Fusobacterium necrophorum, characterised by sore throat followed by rigors and the formation of metastatic abscesses.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparative in vitro activity of telavancin (TD-6424), a rapidly bactericidal, concentration-dependent anti-infective with multiple mechanisms of action against Gram-positive bacteria
TL;DR: It would appear that telavancin has superior potency to the other tested glycopeptides, and on a weight-for-weight basis displays activity that is comparable to, or better than, that of the other agents tested.