Jakub Kronenberg

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the results of an analysis of benefits of ecosystem services in urban areas and show that investing in ecological infrastructure in cities, and the ecological restoration and rehabilitation of ecosystems such as rivers, lakes, and woodlands occurring in urban area, may not only be ecologically and socially desirable, but also quite often, economically advantageous, even based on the most traditional economic approaches.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess green space availability in 299 EU cities according to land use and a population data grid and conclude that UGS availability is an important indicator to navigate urban complexity to improve human health and wellbeing but is only one component of the intricate social-ecological interactions within cities.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors reflect on the current debate of the social effects of greening using selected examples and discuss what trade-offs between social and ecological developments in cities mean for the future debate on greening cities and a socially balanced and inclusive way of developing our cities for various groups of urban dwellers.

TL;DR: The Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (URBES) research project as mentioned in this paper conducted case study and comparative research on urban biodiversity and ecosystem services across seven cities in Europe and the United States.

TL;DR: In this article, a stepwise regression reduced the number of variables from the initial 48 to 24 in the standard model, and to 26 in the fixed effects model (considering the effects of different districts).