Journal•ISSN: 1877-3435
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Elsevier BV
About: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability is an academic journal published by Elsevier BV. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Sustainability & Climate change. It has an ISSN identifier of 1877-3435. Over the lifetime, 1220 publications have been published receiving 70318 citations.
Topics: Sustainability, Climate change, Ecosystem services, Sustainable development, Corporate governance
Papers
More filters
National University of Cordoba1, Addis Ababa University2, National Autonomous University of Mexico3, State University of Campinas4, United Nations Environment Programme5, UNESCO6, United States Department of Agriculture7, Indiana University8, University of British Columbia9, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation10, University of Paris-Sud11, Landcare Research12, University College London13, Autonomous University of Madrid14, University of Cambridge15, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research16, University of Southern Denmark17, United Nations University18, Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment19, The Nature Conservancy20, University of the South Pacific21, University of East Anglia22, Kyushu University23, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology24, University of Washington25, Budapest University of Technology and Economics26, Environmental Law Institute27, Ankara University28, University of Portsmouth29, Chinese Academy of Sciences30, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay31, Kyoto University32, Joseph Fourier University33, National Scientific and Technical Research Council34, University of Yaoundé35, Polish Academy of Sciences36, University of São Paulo37, École Normale Supérieure38, University of Otago39, Stanford University40, University of Queensland41, Azim Premji University42, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ43, University of Ghana44, Corvinus University of Budapest45, Stockholm University46, Lakehead University47, Indian Institute of Forest Management48, Seoul National University49, Sofia University50
TL;DR: The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework as discussed by the authors, which will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions.
1,585 citations
University of Cambridge1, University of the Basque Country2, National Autonomous University of Mexico3, University of Córdoba (Spain)4, Corvinus University of Budapest5, University of Southern Denmark6, University of Gothenburg7, University of East Anglia8, Lund University9, University of Kiel10, United Nations11, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ12, University of Khartoum13, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology14, University of Washington15, University of Oxford16, Ministry of Forestry17, University College Dublin18, National University of Cordoba19, Carthage University20, University of Chile21, Harvard University22, Norwegian University of Life Sciences23, University of Pretoria24, University of Antwerp25, Wetlands International26, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro27, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources28, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research29, University of Western Australia30, National University of General Sarmiento31, Calcutta Institute of Engineering and Management32, European Commission33, Government of Canada34, Finnish Environment Institute35, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro36, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro37, International Institute of Minnesota38, Victoria University of Wellington39, Indian Institute of Forest Management40, University of Tokyo41
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so, and argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.
985 citations
TL;DR: The notion of resilience is gaining increasing prominence across a diverse set of literatures on cities and climate change as discussed by the authors, and efforts to foster climate change resilience must be bundled with efforts to promote urban development and sustainability.
669 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyze the relationship between scientific integration and transdisciplinarity, discuss the dimensions of integration of different knowledge and propose a platform and a paradigm for research towards global sustainability that will be both designed and conducted in partnership between science and society.
661 citations
McGill University1, State University of Campinas2, Rhodes University3, University of Paris-Sud4, National Autonomous University of Mexico5, Chiang Mai University6, Université catholique de Louvain7, Stanford University8, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research9, National University of Cordoba10, Stockholm Resilience Centre11, University of Aveiro12, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg14, University of Southampton15, Pennsylvania State University16, University of Göttingen17, Arizona State University18, VU University Amsterdam19, National Scientific and Technical Research Council20, University of York21
TL;DR: The ecoSERVICES project as discussed by the authors is a platform to foster global coordination of multidisciplinary sustainability science through the lens of ecosystem services, focusing on three key questions that will improve incorporation of ecosystem service research into decision-making for the sustainable use of natural resources to improve human well-being.
550 citations