scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Jason Jonkman published in 2015"


Proceedings ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2015
TL;DR: AeroDyn as discussed by the authors is a tool for analyzing wind turbines aerodynamics and is widely used in many design and analysis applications, such as wind turbine aerodynamics analysis and aerodynamic modeling.
Abstract: Blade element momentum methods, though conceptually simple, are highly useful for analyzing wind turbines aerodynamics and are widely used in many design and analysis applications. A new version of AeroDyn is being developed to take advantage of new robust solution methodologies, conform to a new modularization framework for National Renewable Energy Laboratory's FAST, utilize advanced skewed-wake analysis methods, fix limitations with previous implementations, and to enable modeling of highly flexible and nonstraight blades. This paper reviews blade element momentum theory and several of the options available for analyzing skewed inflow. AeroDyn implementation details are described for the benefit of users and developers. These new options are compared to solutions from the previous version of AeroDyn and to experimental data. Finally, recommendations are given on how one might select from the various available solution approaches.

42 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
21 Oct 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of the free-surface, free-ends and multi-member arrangement of the semi-submersible structure were investigated through code-to-code comparisons and flow visualizations.
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out on the OC4-DeepCwind semi-submersible to obtain a better understanding of how to set hydrodynamic coefficients for the structure when using an engineering tool such as FAST to model the system. The focus here was on the drag behavior and the effects of the free-surface, free-ends and multi-member arrangement of the semi-submersible structure. These effects are investigated through code-to-code comparisons and flow visualizations. The implications on mean load predictions from engineering tools are addressed. The work presented here suggests that selection of drag coefficients should take into consideration a variety of geometric factors. Furthermore, CFD simulations demonstrate large time-varying loads due to vortex shedding, which FAST's hydrodynamic module, HydroDyn, does not model. The implications of these oscillatory loads on the fatigue life needs to be addressed.

30 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: A new mixed-time-step algorithm, sparse-matrix storage, a direct solver for sparse linear systems, and interpolation of rotation fields in space for mesh mapping and in time for time advancement are described.
Abstract: Over the past few years, the FAST wind turbine simulation tool has undergone a major restructuring. FAST is now, at its core, an algorithm and software framework for coupling time-dependent multi-physics modules relevant to computer-aided engineering (CAE) of wind turbines. Each module, which represents one or more turbine components or physics control volumes, is constituted by a mathematical model composed of time-dependent constraint and/or differential equations that are typically nonlinear. Under this new modular form, modules can interact through matching or non-matching spatial meshes and can be time advanced with different time steps and different time integrators. Sharing of data between modules is accomplished with a predictor-corrector approach, which allows for either implicit or explicit time integration within each module. This new modularity positions FAST as a backbone for coupling both high-fidelity and engineering-level wind turbine physics models. In this paper, we describe new features of the FAST modular framework. In particular, we describe a new mixed-time-step algorithm, sparse-matrix storage, a direct solver for sparse linear systems, and interpolation of rotation fields in space for mesh mapping and in time for time advancement. We also show several numerical examples that demonstrate the performance and flexibility of the FAST framework, and we use those results to provide modeling guidance to users.

29 citations


21 Jun 2015
TL;DR: The first half of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation, with Correlation project (OC5) as mentioned in this paper was focused on validating the tools used for modeling offshore wind systems.
Abstract: This paper describes work performed during the first half of Phase I of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation, with Correlation project (OC5). OC5 is a project run under the International Energy Agency Wind Research Task 30, and is focused on validating the tools used for modeling offshore wind systems. In this first phase, simulated responses from a variety of offshore wind modeling tools were validated against tank test data of a fixed, suspended cylinder (without a wind turbine) that was tested under regular and irregular wave conditions at MARINTEK. The results from this phase include an examination of different approaches one can use for defining and calibrating hydrodynamic coefficients for a model, and the importance of higher-order wave models in accurately modeling the hydrodynamic loads on offshore substructures.

23 citations


ReportDOI
01 Sep 2015

22 citations



Proceedings ArticleDOI
31 May 2015
TL;DR: The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRL) as mentioned in this paper has been used for research in the area of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency. Contract DE-AC36-08GO28308.
Abstract: United States. Department of Energy (National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Contract DE-AC36-08GO28308)

15 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2015
TL;DR: A series of simulations of the International Energy Agency Wind Task 30 Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4) floating semisubmersible model were conducted and the wind turbine response predicted by FAST v8, the corresponding FASTv7 results, and results from other participants in the OC4 project were compared.
Abstract: FAST v8 is the latest release of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s wind turbine aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulation software, with several new capabilities and major changes from the previous version. FAST has been significantly altered to improve the simulator’s modularity and to include new functionalities in the form of modules in the FAST v8 framework. This paper focuses on the improvements made for the modeling of floating offshore wind systems. The most significant change was to the hydrodynamic load calculation algorithms, which are embedded in the HydroDyn module. HydroDyn is now capable of applying strip-theory (via an extension of Morison’s equation) at the member level for user-defined geometries. Users may now use a strip-theory-only approach for applying the hydrodynamic loads, as well as the previous potential-flow (radiation/diffraction) approach and a hybrid combination of both methods (radiation/diffraction and the drag component of Morison’s equation). Second-order hydrodynamic implementations in both the wave kinematics used by the strip-theory solution and the wave-excitation loads in the potential-flow solution were also added to HydroDyn. The new floating capabilities were verified through a direct code-to-code comparison. We conducted a series of simulations of the International Energy Agency Wind Task 30 Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4) floating semisubmersible model and compared the wind turbine response predicted by FAST v8, the corresponding FAST v7 results, and results from other participants in the OC4 project. We found good agreement between FAST v7 and FAST v8 when using the linear radiation/diffraction modeling approach. The strip-theory-based approach inherently differs from the radiation/diffraction approach used in FAST v7 and we identified and characterized the differences. Enabling the second-order effects significantly improved the agreement between FAST v8 and the other OC4 participants.

10 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
05 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, aero-hydro-servo-elastic tool FAST v8 is framed in a novel modularization scheme that facilitates the analysis of fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines.
Abstract: Coupled dynamic analysis has an important role in the design of offshore wind turbines because the systems are subject to complex operating conditions from the combined action of waves and wind. The aero-hydro-servo-elastic tool FAST v8 is framed in a novel modularization scheme that facilitates such analysis. Here, we present the verification of new capabilities of FAST v8 to model fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines. We analyze a series of load cases with both wind and wave loads and compare the results against those from the previous international code comparison projects-the International Energy Agency (IEA) Wind Task 23 Subtask 2 Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) and the IEA Wind Task 30 OC3 Continued (OC4) projects. The verification is performed using the NREL 5-MW reference turbine supported by monopile, tripod, and jacket substructures. The substructure structural-dynamics models are built within the new SubDyn module of FAST v8, which uses a linear finite-element beam model with Craig-Bampton dynamic system reduction. This allows the modal properties of the substructure to be synthesized and coupled to hydrodynamic loads and tower dynamics. The hydrodynamic loads are calculated using a new strip theory approach for multimember substructures in the updated HydroDyn module of FAST v8. These modules more » are linked to the rest of FAST through the new coupling scheme involving mapping between module-independent spatial discretizations and a numerically rigorous implicit solver. The results show that the new structural dynamics, hydrodynamics, and coupled solutions compare well to the results from the previous code comparison projects. « less

7 citations



01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In this article, a comparison of two beam codes for aero-servo-elastic frameworks is presented, and the capability of the two codes to simulate highly nonlinear effects is investigated and analyzed.
Abstract: This work presents a comparison of two beam codes for aero-servo-elastic frameworks: a new structural model for the aeroelastic code HAWC2 and a new nonlinear beam model, BeamDyn, for the aeroelastic modularization framework FAST v8. The main goal is to establish the suitability of the two approaches to model the structural behaviour of modern wind turbine blades in operation. Through a series of benchmarking structural cases of increasing complexity, the capability of the two codes to simulate highly nonlinear effects is investigated and analyzed. Results show that even though the geometrically exact beam theory can better model effects such as very large deflections, rotations, and structural couplings, an approach based on a multi-body formulation assembled through linear elements is capable of computing accurate solutions for typical nonlinear beam theory benchmarking cases.

21 Jun 2015
TL;DR: In this article, a calibrated blade element/momentum theory aerodynamic model of the MARIN stock wind turbine is developed and documented using open-source software and calibrated to closely emulate experimental data obtained by the DeepCwind Consortium using a genetic algorithm optimization routine.
Abstract: In this paper, a calibrated blade-element/momentum theory aerodynamic model of the MARIN stock wind turbine is developed and documented. The model is created using open-source software and calibrated to closely emulate experimental data obtained by the DeepCwind Consortium using a genetic algorithm optimization routine. The provided model will be useful for those interested in validating interested in validating floating wind turbine numerical simulators that rely on experiments utilizing the MARIN stock wind turbine—for example, the International Energy Agency Wind Task 30’s Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continued, with Correlation project.

23 Apr 2015
TL;DR: The first half of Phase I of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation, with Correlation project (OC5) as mentioned in this paper was focused on validating the tools used for modeling offshore wind systems.
Abstract: This paper describes work performed during the first half of Phase I of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation, with Correlation project (OC5). OC5 is a project run under the IEA Wind Research Task 30, and is focused on validating the tools used for modeling offshore wind systems. In this first phase, simulated responses from a variety of offshore wind modeling tools were modeling tools were validated against tank test data of a fixed, suspended cylinder (without a wind turbine) that was tested under regular and irregular wave conditions at MARINTEK. The results from this phase include an examination of different approaches one can use for defining and calibrating hydrodynamic coefficients for a model, and the importance of higher-order wave models in accurately modeling the hydrodynamic loads on offshore substructures.

21 Jun 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the second-order wave loads are applied to a structure sequentially for a detailed comparison and a more precise analysis of the effects of the secondorder loads on the response of a TLP floating wind turbine.
Abstract: The first objective of this work is to compare the two floating offshore wind turbine simulation packages {DIFFRAC+aNySIM} and {WAMIT+FAST}. The focus is on second-order wave loads, and so first- and second-order wave loads are applied to a structure sequentially for a detailed comparison and a more precise analysis of the effects of the second-order loads. aNySIM does not have the capability to model flexible bodies, and so the simulations performed in this tool are done assuming a rigid body. FAST also assumes that the platform is rigid, but can account for the flexibility of the tower. The second objective is to study the effects of the second-order loads on the response of a TLP floating wind turbine. The flexibility of the tower must be considered for this investigation, and therefore only FAST is used.

23 Apr 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the simulation results were then compared to measured data from the SWAY system in both turbine operating and non-operating conditions, and mixed results were observed when comparing the simulated system behavior to the measured data.
Abstract: Need to modify simulated system behavior to the measured data, but the tower wind loads improved the comparison for nonoperating conditions. the SWAY system in both turbine operating and nonoperating conditions. Mixed results were observed when comparing the simulated system behavior to the measured data, but the tower wind loads improved the comparison for nonoperating conditions. without the new tower-load capability to examine its influence on the response characteristics of the system. This is important in situations when the turbine is parked in survival conditions. The simulation results were then compared to measured data from the SWAY system in both turbine operating and nonoperating conditions. Mixed results were observed when comparing the simulated system behavior to the measured data, but the tower wind loads improved the comparison for nonoperating conditions.

01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In the latest version of NREL's wind turbine aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulation software, FAST v8, several new capabilities and major changes were introduced as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: In the latest release of NREL's wind turbine aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulation software, FAST v8, several new capabilities and major changes were introduced. FAST has been significantly altered to improve the simulator's modularity and to include new functionalities in the form of modules in the FAST v8 framework. This paper is focused on the improvements made for the modeling of floating offshore wind systems. The most significant change was to the hydrodynamic load calculation algorithms, which are embedded in the HydroDyn module. HydroDyn is now capable of applying strip-theory (via an extension of Morison's equation) at the member level for user-defined geometries. Users may now use a strip-theory-only approach for applying the hydrodynamic loads, as well as the previous potential-flow (radiation/diffraction) approach and a hybrid combination of both methods (radiation/diffraction and the drag component of Morison's equation). Second-order hydrodynamic implementations in both the wave kinematics used by the strip-theory solution and the wave-excitation loads in the potential-flow solution were also added to HydroDyn. The new floating capabilities were verified through a direct code-to-code comparison. We conducted a series of simulations of the International Energy Agency Wind Task 30 Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4) floating semisubmersible model and compared the wind turbine more » response predicted by FAST v8, the corresponding FAST v7 results, and results from other participants in the OC4 project. We found good agreement between FAST v7 and FAST v8 when using the linear radiation/diffraction modeling approach. The strip-theory-based approach inherently differs from the radiation/diffraction approach used in FAST v7 and we identified and characterized the differences. Enabling the second-order effects significantly improved the agreement between FAST v8 and the other OC4 participants. « less

01 Mar 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the second-order wave loads are applied to a structure sequentially for a detailed comparison and a more precise analysis of the effects of the secondorder loads on the response of a TLP floating wind turbine.
Abstract: The first objective of this work is to compare the two floating offshore wind turbine simulation packages {DIFFRAC+aNySIM} and {WAMIT+FAST}. The focus is on second-order wave loads, and so first- and second-order wave loads are applied to a structure sequentially for a detailed comparison and a more precise analysis of the effects of the second-order loads. aNySIM does not have the capability to model flexible bodies, and so the simulations performed in this tool are done assuming a rigid body. FAST also assumes that the platform is rigid, but can account for the flexibility of the tower. The second objective is to study the effects of the second-order loads on the response of a TLP floating wind turbine. The flexibility of the tower must be considered for this investigation, and therefore only FAST is used.