scispace - formally typeset
J

Jay Pil Choi

Researcher at Michigan State University

Publications -  141
Citations -  5764

Jay Pil Choi is an academic researcher from Michigan State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Competition (economics) & Tying. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 136 publications receiving 5326 citations. Previous affiliations of Jay Pil Choi include Harvard University & Tilburg University.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

A Leverage Theory of Tying in Two-Sided Markets

TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a leverage theory of tying in two-sided markets and analyze incentives for a monopolist to tie its monopolized product with another product in a twosided market, which can be more widely applied to any markets in which sales to consumers in one market can generate additional revenues that cannot be competed away due to nonnegative price constraints.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing: Corrigendum and Comment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify two issues in Choi's [2010] paper on tying in two-sided markets published in this Journal, and provide solutions to both of them.
Journal ArticleDOI

A model of patent trolls

TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a model of patent trolls to understand various litigation strategies employed by nonpracticing entities and discuss policy implications including legal fee shifting and the use of injunctive relief.

Internet Security, Vulnerability Disclosure, and Software Provision

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine how software vulnerabilities affect firms that sell software and consumers that purchase software and model three decisions of the firm: an upfront investment in the quality of the software to reduce potential vulnerabilities, a policy decision whether to announce vulnerabilities, and a price for the software.
Posted Content

A Theory of Patent Portfolios

TL;DR: In this paper, a patent portfolio acquisition game is considered in which a third party's patent portfolio is up for sale, and the patent holders acquire an enormous amount of related patents in diverse technology fields such that it becomes impractical to develop a new product that with certainty does not inadvertently infringe on other firms' patent portfolios.