J
Jay Pil Choi
Researcher at Michigan State University
Publications - 141
Citations - 5764
Jay Pil Choi is an academic researcher from Michigan State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Competition (economics) & Tying. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 136 publications receiving 5326 citations. Previous affiliations of Jay Pil Choi include Harvard University & Tilburg University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider a system market where two complementary components must be used in combination to provide valuable services, and they show that integration of the monopolist into the competitive complementary market may distort incentives for R&D, reducing total economic welfare.
Posted Content
Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing
TL;DR: The authors analyzes the effects of tying arrangements on market competition and social welfare in two-sided markets when economic agents can engage in multi-homing; that is, they can participate in multiple platforms in order to reap maximal network benefits.
Journal ArticleDOI
Transfer pricing regulation and tax competition
TL;DR: The authors analyzes multinational enterprises' incentives to manipulate internal transfer prices to take advantage of tax differences across countries, and implications of transfer-pricing regulations as a countermeasure against such profit shifting.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Economic Analysis of Product Pre-announcements
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study when and how firms can make credible pre-announcements and how to build a reputation for being honest in the market and discuss several open issues in need to further research.
Posted Content
A Dynamic Analysis of Licensing: The
Jay Pil Choi,Jay Pil Choi +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop an incomplete contract model of the licensing relationship to analyze the dynamic effects of licensing on R&D competition in the innovation market and examine the rationale for often observed grant-back clauses.