scispace - formally typeset
M

Mauro Bianchi

Researcher at ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon

Publications -  22
Citations -  454

Mauro Bianchi is an academic researcher from ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prejudice (legal term) & Ingroups and outgroups. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 22 publications receiving 302 citations. Previous affiliations of Mauro Bianchi include Universidade Lusófona & University of Jena.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated individuals' willingness to engage in prescribed and discretionary behaviors, as well as country-level and individual-level factors that might drive such behavioral intentions, and found that the more people endorsed moral principles of fairness and care (vs. loyalty and authority), the more they were inclined to report trust in science, which, in turn, statistically predicted prescribed, discretionary behavioral intentions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nomina Sunt Omina: On the Inductive Potential of Nouns and Adjectives in Person Perception

TL;DR: The authors predicted and found that nouns, more so than adjectives, facilitate descriptor-congruen inferences but inhibit incongruent inferences, suggesting that despite the surface similarity of nouns and adjective, nouns have a more powerful impact on person perception.
Journal ArticleDOI

Facing Europe Visualizing Spontaneous In-Group Projection

TL;DR: It is found that German and Portuguese participants’ visual representations of European faces resembled the appearance typical for their own national identity, even among participants who explicitly denied that one nation was more typical of Europe than the other.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Do You Mean by “European”? Evidence of Spontaneous Ingroup Projection

TL;DR: The findings indicate that the cognitive representation of the superordinate category is based on ingroup traits and that this representation is context dependent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Like me or like us: is ingroup projection just social projection?

TL;DR: German participants rated how typical a series of attributes was for the ingroup, an inclusive category, the self, and an outgroup (i.e., Italians), showing that ingroup projection is stronger than social projection, but only when typical ingroup attributes are concerned.