Suzan Ceylan-Batur

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated individuals' willingness to engage in prescribed and discretionary behaviors, as well as country-level and individual-level factors that might drive such behavioral intentions, and found that the more people endorsed moral principles of fairness and care (vs. loyalty and authority), the more they were inclined to report trust in science, which, in turn, statistically predicted prescribed, discretionary behavioral intentions.

TL;DR: This article examined factors that are likely to be associated with preferred behavioral and emotional responses to honor threatening situations and possible differences between a dignity culture (U.K.) and an honor culture (TR) and found that Turkish participants reported significantly higher levels of negative emotional response compared to British participants in the false accusation (not humiliation) scenario and in the public (not private) setting.

TL;DR: The authors examined the role of justification for violence (honor-based vs. non-honorbased conflict), honor concerns (feminine, masculine, family, moral integrity), and fundamentalist religious orientation in predicting tolerance to violence against women (VAW) in an honor culture, Turkey.