scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter M. Gollwitzer

Researcher at University of Konstanz

Publications -  302
Citations -  36670

Peter M. Gollwitzer is an academic researcher from University of Konstanz. The author has contributed to research in topics: Implementation intention & Action (philosophy). The author has an hindex of 78, co-authored 285 publications receiving 33990 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter M. Gollwitzer include Max Planck Society & University of York.

Papers
More filters

Enhancing consumer behaviour with implementation intentions

TL;DR: In this paper, a self-regulation strategy called mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) has been designed to allow people to personalize the content of the ifand then-parts of their implementation intentions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Incidental affective influences on effort-related cardiac response: The critical role of choosing task characteristics.

TL;DR: In this article , the authors tested whether personal choice vs. external assignment of task characteristics moderates the effect of incidental affective stimulation on effort-related cardiovascular response and found that personal choice leads to action shielding, whereas individuals remain receptive for affective influences during volition when task characteristics are assigned.

La ténacité flexible dans la poursuite des buts personnels

TL;DR: In this article, a number of results demontrent que planification specifique (implementation intention) facilite the realisation du but, i.e., the declenchement automatique de l'action appropriee and the protection of la demarche vers le but contre les deraillements qui pourraient etre causes par des distractions, des tentations ou des etats internes nuisibles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relatedness needs and negative fantasies as the origins of obsessive thinking in romantic relationships

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed that a threat to the need for relatedness increases obsessive thinking about a romantic partner when combined with a negatively valenced future fantasy about the partner and tested this hypothesis in three experiments: Experiment 1, administered online, used a meta-cognitive relatedness threat manipulation, a scenario-based fantasy valence manipulation, and a measure of obsessive thinking.