scispace - formally typeset
R

Robert Tibshirani

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  620
Citations -  359457

Robert Tibshirani is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lasso (statistics) & Gene expression profiling. The author has an hindex of 147, co-authored 593 publications receiving 326580 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert Tibshirani include University of Toronto & University of California.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

TREELETS-AN ADAPTIVE MULTI-SCALE BASIS FOR SPARSE UNORDERED DATA. Discussions

TL;DR: Treelets as discussed by the authors extends wavelet wavelet to nonsmooth signals and returns a hierarchical tree and an orthonormal basis, which both reflect the internal structure of the data and are especially well suited as a dimensionality reduction and feature selection tool prior to regression and classification.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monotone Shrinkage of Trees

TL;DR: A new method for regression trees which obtains estimates and predictions subject to constraints on the coefficients representing the effects of splits in the tree and for some problems gives better predictions than cost-complexity pruning used in the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Who is the Fastest Man in the World

TL;DR: The authors compare the world record sprint races of Donovan Bailey and Michael Johnson in the 1996 Olympic Games, and try to answer the questions: 1. Who is faster?, and 2. Which performance was more remarkable?
Posted ContentDOI

Can Auxiliary Indicators Improve COVID-19 Forecasting and Hotspot Prediction?

TL;DR: In this paper, the utility of these indicators from a forecasting perspective is studied. But the authors focus on five indicators, derived from medical insurance claims data, web search queries, and online survey responses, and ask whether their inclusion in a simple model leads to improved predictive accuracy relative to a similar model excluding it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scientific research in the age of omics: the good, the bad, and the sloppy.

TL;DR: An online, open-access, postpublication, peer review system that will increase the accountability of scientists for the quality of their research and the ability of readers to distinguish good from sloppy science is urged.