scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Stuart S. Levine published in 2020"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although several of the new methodologies do reduce the amount of artificially over- and underrepresented microRNAs (miRNAs), it is observed that none of the methods was able to remove all of the bias in the library preparation.
Abstract: Small RNAs (smRNAs) are important regulators of many biologic processes and are now most frequently characterized using Illumina sequencing. However, although standard RNA sequencing library preparation has become routine in most sequencing facilities, smRNA sequencing library preparation has historically been challenging because of high input requirements, laborious protocols involving gel purifications, inability to automate, and a lack of benchmarking standards. Additionally, studies have suggested that many of these methods are nonlinear and do not accurately reflect the amounts of smRNAs in vivo. Recently, a number of new kits have become available that permit lower input amounts and less laborious, gel-free protocol options. Several of these new kits claim to reduce RNA ligase-dependent sequence bias through novel adapter modifications and to lessen adapter-dimer contamination in the resulting libraries. With the increasing number of smRNA kits available, understanding the relative strengths of each method is crucial for appropriate experimental design. In this study, we systematically compared 9 commercially available smRNA library preparation kits as well as NanoString probe hybridization across multiple study sites. Although several of the new methodologies do reduce the amount of artificially over- and underrepresented microRNAs (miRNAs), we observed that none of the methods was able to remove all of the bias in the library preparation. Identical samples prepared with different methods show highly varied levels of different miRNAs. Even so, many methods excelled in ease of use, lower input requirement, fraction of usable reads, and reproducibility across sites. These differences may help users select the most appropriate methods for their specific question of interest.

11 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Application of solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) beads for size selection in molecular biology should be expanded, in light of the property of the beads to accommodate to high MW intervals of DNA fragment size selection, depending on composition of bead-suspension buffer.
Abstract: Application of solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) beads for size selection in molecular biology should be expanded, in light of the property of the beads to accommodate to high MW intervals of DNA fragment size selection, depending on composition of bead-suspension buffer. Here we show how the conventional size selection interval of 150–800 bp be shifted to 1.5–7 Kbp with by adjusting the concentration of NaCl in the stock suspension buffer. The MW capacity of SPRI beads also change when NaCl replaced with other cations and when the concentration of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 is decreased. Testing the limits of SPRI beads revealed cuts as high as 10 Kbp are possible for some salt/PEG combinations of modified SPRI beads-suspension buffers.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An automated and miniaturized workflow for RNA library preparation that minimizes reagent usage and processing time required per sample to generate Illumina compatible libraries for sequencing is presented.
Abstract: Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have allowed RNA sequencing to become an increasingly time efficient, cost-effective, and accessible tool for genomic research. We present here an automated and miniaturized workflow for RNA library preparation that minimizes reagent usage and processing time required per sample to generate Illumina compatible libraries for sequencing. The reduced-volume libraries show similar behavior to full-scale libraries with comparable numbers of genes detected and reproducible clustering of samples.

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A survey was conducted to answer questions about staffing, services, financial models, and challenges to better understand the challenges bioinformatics core facilities are currently faced with and will need to address going forward.
Abstract: Over the last decade, the cost of -omics data creation has decreased 10-fold, whereas the need for analytical support for those data has increased exponentially. Consequently, bioinformaticians face a second wave of challenges: novel applications of existing approaches (e.g., single-cell RNA sequencing), integration of -omics data sets of differing size and scale (e.g., spatial transcriptomics), as well as novel computational and statistical methods, all of which require more sophisticated pipelines and data management. Nonetheless, bioinformatics cores are often asked to operate under primarily a cost-recovery model, with limited institutional support. Seeing the need to assess bioinformatics core operations, the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Genomics Bioinformatics Research Group conducted a survey to answer questions about staffing, services, financial models, and challenges to better understand the challenges bioinformatics core facilities are currently faced with and will need to address going forward. Of the respondent groups, we chose to focus on the survey data from smaller cores, which made up the majority. Although all cores indicated similar challenges in terms of changing technologies and analysis needs, small cores tended to have the added challenge of funding their operations largely through cost-recovery models with heavy administrative burdens.

1 citations