scispace - formally typeset
S

Suresh Mahalingam

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  130
Citations -  5650

Suresh Mahalingam is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Virus & Chikungunya. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 116 publications receiving 4683 citations. Previous affiliations of Suresh Mahalingam include Indian Institute of Technology Madras & RMIT University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanism of interleukin‐25 (IL‐17E)‐induced pulmonary inflammation and airways hyper‐reactivity

TL;DR: Although IL‐25 up‐regulates IL‐13 in the lung, the contribution of this and other type 2 cytokine signalling pathways to the induction and persistence of airways hyper‐reactivity (AHR) and allergic inflammation are unclear.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hendra virus: an emerging paramyxovirus in Australia

TL;DR: Recent identification of Hendra virus infection in a domestic animal outside the laboratory setting, and the large range of pteropid bats in Australia, underpins the potential of this virus to cause greater morbidity and mortality in both rural and urban populations and its importance to both veterinary and human health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Complement Contributes to Inflammatory Tissue Destruction in a Mouse Model of Ross River Virus-Induced Disease

TL;DR: It is demonstrated here that the complement system, an important component of the innate immune response, enhances the severity of RRV-induced disease in mice and suggested that complement plays an essential role in the effector phase, but not the inductive phase, of RRv-induced arthritis and myositis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential induction of type I interferon responses in myeloid dendritic cells by mosquito and mammalian-cell-derived alphaviruses.

TL;DR: Alphaviruses were used to determine whether viruses grown in mosquito cells differed from mammalian-cell-derived viruses in their ability to induce type I interferon (IFN) responses in infected primary dendritic cells, and results suggest that the viruses initially delivered by the mosquito vector differ from those generated in subsequent rounds of replication in the host.