BACKGROUND In adult mammalian organisms, multiple tissues—including the skin, blood, stomach, and intestines—are entrapped in a state of permanent regeneration; older cells are constantly shed, and the tissue is continuously being regenerated from resident stem cells. This phenomenon of “tissue renewal” was appreciated by Leblond in 1956, but the underlying mechanism has been unclear. It is now evident that a class of extracellular developmental signaling proteins, known as Wnt signals, animate the continued renewal of several mammalian tissues by fuelling stem cell activity. If the Wnt pathway is inhibited, tissue renewal is crippled. This signaling pathway is an ancient evolutionary program dating from when Wnt signals arose in the simplest multicellular organisms, in which Wnts acted as primordial symmetry-breaking signals crucial for the generation of patterned tissues during embryogenesis. In vertebrates, these signals also function in pattern maintenance: They sustain tissue renewal, enabling tissues to be continuously replenished and maintained over a lifetime. Multiple adult organs are in a state of continual regeneration. In tissues such as the skin, intestines, brain, and mammary glands, Wnt signaling proteins sustain this constant regeneration by inducing stem cells (green cells in the illustration) to grow. This leads to the robust supply of new cells (green) in order to replenish and maintain the tissue. [Image credits are available in the full article online.] ADVANCES In contrast to traditional “long-range” developmental signals, Wnts seem to act as short-range intercellular signals—acting mostly between adjacent cells. Lending credence to this notion, a membrane-tethered Wnt protein variant can fulfill most functions of a normal Wnt protein in Drosophila . Likely explaining the short-range nature of these signals, Wnt proteins are attached to a lipid and therefore are hydrophobic; they cannot freely traverse the extracellular space by themselves. This provides insight into how tissue renewal is regulated. It implies that Wnt signals emanating from the stem cell microenvironment (the “niche”) may influence adjacent stem cells without affecting a broad field of cells located farther away. The concept of an external niche, however, may have to be refined because it is clear that stem cells can sometimes act as their own niche and have unexpected developmental self-organizing capacities. Last, the widespread importance of Wnt signaling in driving tissue renewal has been revealed by the identification of Axin2 and Lgr5 , genes expressed in cells that are responding to Wnt signals. Genetically labeling Axin2 + or Lgr5 + cells in a variety of tissues has revealed that such cells fuel tissue renewal in the intestines, mammary gland, skin, and brain, among other organs. OUTLOOK The amazing continuous self-regeneration of various mammalian tissues over years and decades continues to be an enigmatic terra incognita in biology. For instance, visualization of stem cells in real-time in vivo (through intravital microscopy) has shown that when some stem cells are ablated, they are replaced by more differentiated cells that are recalled to the stem cell niche, whereupon they regain stem cell identity to effect tissue repair. Therefore, lineage barriers between stem cell and differentiated fates are not always stringent and can be traversed during times of tissue damage. Reactivated Wnt signals may be instrumental in this process, and perhaps such signals could be exploited in order to enkindle tissue regeneration after injury or disease. From a pragmatic perspective, Wnt signals have already found practical use in manipulating stem cells, enabling propagation of stem cells in vitro as self-renewing cell populations and as organoids.

An integral program for tissue renewal and regeneration: Wnt signaling and stem cell control

Small populations of adult stem cells are responsible for the remarkable ability of the epithelial lining of the intestine to be efficiently renewed and repaired throughout life. The recent discovery of specific markers for these stem cells, together with the development of new technologies to track endogenous stem cell activity in vivo and to exploit their ability to generate new epithelia ex vivo, has greatly improved our understanding of stem cell-driven homeostasis, regeneration and cancer in the intestine. These exciting new insights into the biology of intestinal stem cells have the potential to accelerate the development of stem cell-based therapies and ameliorate cancer treatments.

Adult intestinal stem cells: critical drivers of epithelial homeostasis and regeneration

Recent examples have highlighted how stem cells have the capability to initiate morphogenesis in vitro; that is, to generate complex structures in culture that closely parallel their in vivo counterparts. Lgr5, the receptor for the Wnt-agonistic R-spondins, marks stem cells in multiple adult organs of mice and humans. In R-spondin-based three-dimensional cultures, these Lgr5 stem cells can grow into ever-expanding epithelial organoids that retain their original organ identity. Single Lgr5 stem cells derived from the intestine can be cultured to build epithelial structures that retain hallmarks of the in vivo epithelium. Here, we review the mechanisms that support this notable example of self-organization and discuss applications of this technology for stem cell research, disease modeling (e.g., for colorectal cancer and cystic fibrosis), and regenerative medicine.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/340/6137/1190.full.pdf

Growing self-organizing mini-guts from a single intestinal stem cell: mechanism and applications

http://crcooper01.people.ysu.edu/Clevers%202013%20Review%20ISCs%5B1%5D.pdf

The Intestinal Crypt, A Prototype Stem Cell Compartment

Two types of stem cells are currently defined in small intestinal crypts: cycling crypt base columnar (CBC) cells and quiescent ‘+4’ cells. Here, we combine transcriptomics with proteomics to define a definitive molecular signature for Lgr5 + CBC cells. Transcriptional profiling of FACS‐sorted Lgr5 + stem cells and their daughters using two microarray platforms revealed an mRNA stem cell signature of 384 unique genes. Quantitative mass spectrometry on the same cell populations identified 278 proteins enriched in intestinal stem cells. The mRNA and protein data sets showed a high level of correlation and a combined signature of 510 stem cell‐enriched genes was defined. Spatial expression patterns were further characterized by mRNA in‐situ hybridization, revealing that approximately half of the genes were expressed in a gradient with highest levels at the crypt bottom, while the other half was expressed uniquely in Lgr5 + stem cells. Lineage tracing using a newly established knock‐in mouse for one of the signature genes, Smoc2 , confirmed its stem cell specificity. Using this resource, we find—and confirm by independent approaches—that the proposed quiescent/‘+4’ stem cell markers Bmi1 , Tert , Hopx and Lrig1 are robustly expressed in CBC cells.

/pdf/the-lgr5-intestinal-stem-cell-signature-robust-expression-of-114zl1whqg.pdf

The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent ‘+4’ cell markers

The Pan-ErbB Negative Regulator Lrig1 Is an Intestinal Stem Cell Marker that Functions as a Tumor Suppressor

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene. The incidence of specific KRAS alleles varies between cancers from different sites, but it is unclear whether allelic selection results from biological selection for specific mutant KRAS proteins. We used a cross-disciplinary approach to compare KRASG12D, a common mutant form, and KRASA146T, a mutant that occurs only in selected cancers. Biochemical and structural studies demonstrated that KRASA146T exhibits a marked extension of switch 1 away from the protein body and nucleotide binding site, which activates KRAS by promoting a high rate of intrinsic and guanine nucleotide exchange factor-induced nucleotide exchange. Using mice genetically engineered to express either allele, we found that KRASG12D and KRASA146T exhibit distinct tissue-specific effects on homeostasis that mirror mutational frequencies in human cancers. These tissue-specific phenotypes result from allele-specific signaling properties, demonstrating that context-dependent variations in signaling downstream of different KRAS mutants drive the KRAS mutational pattern seen in cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Although epidemiologic and clinical studies have suggested allele-specific behaviors for KRAS, experimental evidence for allele-specific biological properties is limited. We combined structural biology, mass spectrometry, and mouse modeling to demonstrate that the selection for specific KRAS mutants in human cancers from different tissues is due to their distinct signaling properties.See related commentary by Hobbs and Der, p. 696.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 681.

https://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/candisc/early/2019/04/05/2159-8290.CD-18-1220.full-text.pdf

Yina Li

Papers

The Pan-ErbB Negative Regulator Lrig1 Is an Intestinal Stem Cell Marker that Functions as a Tumor Suppressor

Tissue-Specific Oncogenic Activity of KRASA146T

Using a new Lrig1 reporter mouse to assess differences between two Lrig1 antibodies in the intestine.