American Pharmacists Association

About: American Pharmacists Association is a other organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Pharmacist & Pharmacy. The organization has 2413 authors who have published 1969 publications receiving 30470 citations. The organization is also known as: APhA & American Pharmaceutical Association.

Development and implementation of a pharmacist-delivered Medicare annual wellness visit at a family practice office

Abstract: Objective To describe the development and implementation of a pharmacist-delivered Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (MWV) Setting Physician-owned, private family practice office Practice innovation Pharmacist-delivered MWV Main outcome measures Patient visits and practice income Results Because of time constraints in the practice, physicians, nurse practitioners, and a physician assistant had been unable to offer MWVs, a new service available to Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act A pharmacist who was previously providing patient care services 1 day/week at a fixed hourly rate was able to add an additional 1 day/week for provision of MWVs These visits involve updating medical and medication histories; measuring weight, mass, and blood pressure; assessing cognitive and physical function; and screening the patient and recommending preventive services From September 2012 to February 2013, 174 patients participated in the pharmacist-delivered MWV Pharmacist visits were billed using codes G0438 and G0439, and the practice realized a positive net income for the MWVs Conclusion Pharmacist-delivered MWVs are financially viable and allow for greater pharmacist participation on the primary care team

Effect of pharmacist interventions on medication use and cost in hospitalized patients with or without HIV infection

Abstract: Pharmacotherapeutic interventions and drug acquisition costs in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients on a hospital medical service were studied. In November and December 1995, HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients were randomly selected and matched on the basis of admission date. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions were recorded by a pharmacist until the time of discharge. Drug acquisition costs were obtained through records of medications ordered. The two patient groups were compared with respect to length of stay (LOS), number and cost of medications, and number of interventions. HIV-positive patients had significantly more medication orders and required more interventions than HIV-negative patients. Mean LOS was not significantly different. HIV status and number of medications were significantly associated with requiring five or more interventions. Drug acquisition costs were significantly higher in the HIV-positive group. The mean pharmacist-attributed cost saving per patient was $134 for HIV-positive patients and $27 for HIV-negative patients. HIV-positive patients required more interventions and consumed more medication resources than HIV-negative patients. Pharmacist interventions produced drug acquisition cost savings for both groups, with more savings being realized for positive patients.

Observational study on off-label use of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19.

Abstract: Background In December 2019 a novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2 was identified, and the disease COVID-19 has caused many deaths. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with the development of cytokine storm (including interleukin 6 (IL-6)), which can cause lung damage and lack of oxygen. Tocilizumab (TCZ) inhibits ligand binding to the IL-6 receptor and may be a potential treatment for the hyperinflammation symptoms of COVID-19. However, data regarding the efficacy of TCZ in COVID-19 are lacking. The rapid spread of the pandemic in France, especially in the Paris region, constrained us to the off-label use of TCZ in patients with severe clinical conditions. Methods A single-centre observational cohort study of 44 patients infected with COVID-19 was carried out between 6 April and 21 April 2020 in Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil (GHILRM). Twenty-two patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were treated with TCZ and were compared with 22 patients not treated with TCZ matched for age, gender and length of hospital stay for COVID-19. Respiratory rate and oxygen supplementation as well as laboratory parameters (such as C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) were collected at baseline and during 14 days of follow-up. Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of TCZ on respiratory clinical conditions. Findings The average respiratory rate was lower in the TCZ group than in the control group (21.5 vs 25.5 breaths/min at day 14, 95% CI −7.5 to −0.4; p=0.03). Treated patients tended to be intubated less during the course of the disease (2/22 vs 6/22, 95% CI −0.4 to 0.1; p=0.12). In each group, 10 patients no longer required oxygen therapy. We found a significant decrease in CRP in treated patients on day 7 (p=0.04). TCZ caused cytolysis in more than half (14/22) of the patients but without clinical impact. Interpretation There was a significant difference in the respiratory rate on day 14 of follow-up, with a greater decrease observed in the treated group. Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation in the TCZ group, especially among patients with more extensive CT lung damage, than in the control group. The same number of patients were weaned off oxygen on day 14 in the two groups, while the patients in the TCZ group had more severe impairment at inclusion. We consider that TCZ showed significant control of the biological inflammatory syndrome, suggesting that it may limit the effect of the cytokine storm. Our study seems to indicate the efficacy of TCZ, particularly in patients with severe initial pulmonary impairment. Selecting the best candidates and the best timing for TCZ therapy needs to be determined in randomised clinical trials.

Canadian Guidelines on Opioid Use Disorder Among Older Adults

Abstract: Background In Canada, rates of hospital admission from opioid overdose are higher for older adults (≥ 65) than younger adults, and opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing concern. In response, Health Canada commissioned the Canadian Coalition of Seniors’ Mental Health to create guidelines for the prevention, screening, assessment, and treatment of OUD in older adults. Methods A systematic review of English language literature from 2008–2018 regarding OUD in adults was conducted. Previously published guidelines were evaluated using AGREE II, and key guidelines updated using ADAPTE method, by drawing on current literature. Recommendations were created and assessed using the GRADE method. Results Thirty-two recommendations were created. Prevention recommendations: it is key to prioritize non-pharmacological and non-opioid strategies to treat acute and chronic noncancer pain. Assessment recommendations: a comprehensive assessment is important to help discern contributions of other medical conditions. Treatment recommendations: buprenorphine is first line for both withdrawal management and maintenance therapy, while methadone, slow-release oral morphine, or naltrexone can be used as alternatives under certain circumstances; non-pharmacological treatments should be offered as an integrated part of care. Conclusion These guidelines provide practical and timely clinical recommendations on the prevention, assessment, and treatment of OUD in older adults within the Canadian context.