scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Hebron University

EducationHebron, Palestinian Territory
About: Hebron University is a education organization based out in Hebron, Palestinian Territory. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 2714 authors who have published 4180 publications receiving 163736 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A case of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive metastatic submandibular SDC with a complete and durable clinical response to treatment with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is reported.
Abstract: Background. Salivary ductal carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon malignant tumor of the salivary glands. Although there is no known standard of care for the treatment of ad- vanced disease, the vast majority of patients with SDC may be offered palliative systemic therapy. We report a case of epi- dermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic submandibular SDC with a complete and durable clinical response to treatment with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. Methods and Results. A 62-year-old man was diagnosed with SDC of the left submandibular gland with extensive cervical lymph node involvement. The lesion was completely resected, and the patient underwent postoperative radiotherapy. After 6 months, multiple pulmonary metastatic lesions were detected. A complete response was reached with trastuzumab-based com- bination therapy, and no evidence of disease progression has been observed after 14 months of initiation of systemic therapy. Conclusion. Trastuzumab-based combination therapies should be considered for advanced SDC. V C 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 30: 680-683, 2008

86 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The proportion of patients with progression on disability measures was lower in those who initiated ocrelizumab early than in those initially receiving placebo for most of the measures of 24-week confirmed disability progression.
Abstract: Summary Background The safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis were shown in the phase 3 ORATORIO trial. In this study, we assessed the effects of maintaining or switching to ocrelizumab therapy on measures of disease progression and safety in the open-label extension phase of ORATORIO. Methods ORATORIO was an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 182 study locations including academic centres, hospitals, and community speciality centres within 29 countries across the Americas, Australia, Europe, Israel, New Zealand, and Russia. Patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis aged 18–55 years who had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3·0–6·5 were eligible for enrolment. Those who had previous treatment with B-cell-targeted therapies or other immunosuppressive medications were excluded. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous infusion of 600 mg of ocrelizumab (two 300 mg infusions 14 days apart) or placebo every 24 weeks for at least 120 weeks until a prespecified number (n=253) of disability events occurred. After the double-blind phase, patients entered an extended controlled period of variable duration, during which they and investigators became aware of treatment allocation. Following this period, patients could enter an optional open-label extension, during which they continued ocrelizumab or switched from placebo to ocrelizumab. Time to onset of disability progression was confirmed at 24 weeks with four measures (ie, increase in EDSS score, ≥20% increase in time to complete the 9-Hole Peg Test [9HPT], ≥20% increase in time to perform the Timed 25-Foot Walk [T25FW], and composite progression defined as the first confirmed occurrence of any of these three individual measures), as was time to requiring a wheelchair (EDSS ≥7). Conventional MRI measures were also analysed. The intention-to-treat population was used for the safety and efficacy analyses; all analyses, and their timings, were done post hoc. ORATORIO is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01194570 , and is ongoing. Findings From March 3, 2011, to Dec 27, 2012, 488 patients were randomly assigned to the ocrelizumab group and 244 to the placebo group. The extended controlled period started on July 24, 2015, and ended on April 27, 2016, when the last patient entered the open-label extension. Overall, 544 (74%) of 732 participants completed the double-blind period to week 144; 527 (97%) of 544 entered the open-label extension phase, of whom 451 (86%) are ongoing in the open-label extension. After at least 6·5 study years (48 weeks per study year) of follow-up, the proportion of patients with progression on disability measures was lower in those who initiated ocrelizumab early than in those initially receiving placebo for most of the measures of 24-week confirmed disability progression: EDSS, 51·7% vs 64·8% (difference 13·1% [95% CI 4·9–21·3]; p=0·0018); 9HPT, 30·6% vs 43·1% (12·5% [4·1–20·9]); p=0·0035); T25FW, 63·2% vs 70·7% (7·5% [–0·3 to 15·2]; p=0·058); composite progression, 73·2% vs 83·3% (10·1% [3·6–16·6]; p=0·0023); and confirmed time to requiring a wheelchair, 11·5% vs 18·9% (7·4% [0·8–13·9]; p=0·0274). At study end, the percentage change from baseline was lower in those who initiated ocrelizumab early than in those initially receiving placebo for T2 lesion volume (0·45% vs 13·00%, p Interpretation Compared with patients switching from placebo, earlier and continuous ocrelizumab treatment provided sustained benefits on measures of disease progression over the 6·5 study years of follow-up. Although this study shows the benefit of earlier intervention with ocrelizumab in primary progressive disease, progression remains an important unmet need in multiple sclerosis. Further research should focus on how the potential benefits described in this study might be improved upon, particularly over longer time periods. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.

86 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In SOTR, a booster strategy 5 weeks after standard influenza vaccination is safe and effective and induces an increased antibody response compared with standard influenzavaccine consisting of a single dose.
Abstract: Background Influenza vaccine effectiveness is not optimal in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). We hypothesized that a booster dose might increase it. Methods TRANSGRIPE 1-2 is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 stratified by study site, type of organ, and time since transplantation) to receive 1 dose (control group) or 2 doses (booster group) of the influenza vaccine 5 weeks apart. Results A total of 499 SOTR were enrolled. Although seroconversion at 10 weeks did not meet significance in the modified intention-to-treat population, seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the booster arm for the per-protocol population (53.8% vs 37.6% for influenza A(H1N1)pdm; 48.1% vs 32.3% for influenza A(H3N2); and 90.7% vs 75% for influenza B; P < .05). Furthermore, seroprotection at 10 weeks was higher in the booster group: 54% vs 43.2% for A(H1N1)pdm; 56.9% vs 45.5% for A(H3N2); and 83.4% vs 71.8% for influenza B (P < .05). The number needed to treat to seroprotect 1 patient was <10. The clinical efficacy (99.2% vs 98.8%) and serious adverse events (6.4% vs 7.5%) were similar for both groups. Conclusions In SOTR, a booster strategy 5 weeks after standard influenza vaccination is safe and effective and induces an increased antibody response compared with standard influenza vaccination consisting of a single dose. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT (2011-003243-21).

86 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this heavily pre-treated advanced HNC cohort of the phase Ia PCD4989g clinical trial, atezolizumab had a tolerable safety profile and encouraging activity, with responses observed regardless of HPV status and PD-L1 expression level.

86 citations


Authors

Showing all 2723 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
José Baselga156707122498
M. I. Martínez134125179885
Josep Tabernero11180368982
Jordi Rello10369435994
Xavier Montalban9576252842
James M. Downey9138129506
Enriqueta Felip8362253364
Joaquim Bellmunt8266041472
Joan Montaner8048922413
Marc Miravitlles7665125671
David H. Salat7524136779
Eduard Gratacós7553120178
Alex Rovira7435619586
Ramon Bataller7228319316
Maria Buti7149326596
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

VU University Medical Center
22.9K papers, 1.1M citations

88% related

Netherlands Cancer Institute
17.2K papers, 1.1M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
202212
2021568
2020545
2019483
2018385