scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Hebron University

EducationHebron, Palestinian Territory
About: Hebron University is a education organization based out in Hebron, Palestinian Territory. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 2714 authors who have published 4180 publications receiving 163736 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Charles S. Fuchs1, Kohei Shitara, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Sara Lonardi, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Eric Van Cutsem2, David H. Ilson3, Maria Alsina4, Ian Chau5, Jill Lacy1, Michel Ducreux6, Michel Ducreux7, Guillermo Mendez8, Alejandro Molina Alavez, Daisuke Takahari, Wasat Mansoor, Peter C. Enzinger9, Vera Gorbounova, Zev A. Wainberg10, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, David Ferry11, Ji Lin11, Roberto Carlesi11, Mayukh Das11, Manish A. Shah12, Manish A. Shah13, Alexander Luft, Nina A. Karaseva, Rubén Dario Kowalyszyn, Carlos Alberto Hernandez, Tibor Csoszi, Ferdinando De Vita, Per Pfeiffer, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Judit Kocsis, Andràs Csilla, György Bodoky, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Svetlana Protsenko, A Madi, Elzbieta Wojcik, Baruch Brenner, Gunnar Folprecht, Tomasz Sarosiek, Katriina Peltola, Peter Bono, Hubert Ayala, Giuseppe Aprile, Cardellino Giovanni Gerardo, Fidel David Huitzil Melendez, Alfredo Falcone, Francesco Di Costanzo, Moustapha Tehfe, Laurent Mineur, Pilar Garcia Alfonso, Radka Obermannova, Hélène Senellart, Russell D. Petty, Leslie Samuel, Peter Istvan Acs, Maen A. Hussein, Marina N. Nechaeva, F.L.G. Erdkamp, Elizabeth Won, Johanna C. Bendell, Javier Gallego Plazas, Sylvie Lorenzen, Bohuslav Melichar, Miguel Angel Escudero, Denis Pezet, Jean-Marc Phelip, Diego Lucas Kaen, James A. Jr Reeves, Federico Longo Munoz, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Carlo Barone, Luis Fein, Angel Gomez Villanueva, Mohamed Hebbar, Jana Prausová, Laura Visa Turmo, Joana Vidal Barrull, Mette Karen Yilmaz, Alex Beny, H.M.W. Van Laarhoven, Brian Anthony DiCarlo, Taito Esaki, Kazumasa Fujitani, Karen Geboes, Ravit Geva, Shigenori Kadowaki, Stephen Leong, Nozomu Machida, Moses Sundar Raj, Francisco Javier Ramirez Godinez, Agnes Ruzsa, Hugo Ford, William E. Lawler, Nicolas Robert Maisey, Jiri Petera, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Isabelle Sinapi, Kensei Yamaguchi, Hiroki Hara, J.T. Beck, Maria Błasińska-Morawiec, Ricardo Villalobos Valencia, Thierry Alcindor, Madhuri Bajaj, Scott M. Berry, Christina Maria Gomez, Daniel Dammrich, Ravindranath Patel, Julien Taieb, A.J. Ten Tije, Ronald L. Burkes, Fernando Cabanillas, Irfan Firdaus, Cynthia Coo Chua, Shuichi Hironaka, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Howard J. Lim, Marianne Nordsmark, Bela Piko, Udit Verma, Jonathan Wadsley, Seigo Yukisawa, Francisco Gutiérrez Delgado, Crystal S. Denlinger, Raija Kallio, Joanna Pikiel, Joanna Wojcik-Tomaszewska, Christine Brezden-Masley, Raymond Jang, Jana Pribylova, Daisuke Sakai, Maria Alejandra Bartoli, Annemieke Cats, M.I. Grootscholten, Robert Andrew Dichmann, Hugo Hool, Walid Shaib, Akihito Tsuji, Marc Van den Eynde, Hector Velez-Cortez, Timothy R. Asmis 
TL;DR: The addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Abstract: Summary Background VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1–5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117. Findings Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607–0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5–6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5–5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768–1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801–1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9–11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5–11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1). Interpretation Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current status of blood-born biomarkers as surrogates for tissue-based biomarkers, and their burgeoning impact on the management of patients with breast cancer are discussed.
Abstract: Circulating blood biomarkers promise to become non-invasive real-time surrogates for tumour tissue-based biomarkers. Circulating biomarkers have been investigated as tools for breast cancer diagnosis, the dissection of breast cancer biology and its genetic and clinical heterogeneity, prognostication, prediction and monitoring of therapeutic response and resistance. Circulating tumour cells and cell-free plasma DNA have been analysed in retrospective studies, and the assessment of these biomarkers is being incorporated into clinical trials. As the scope of breast cancer intratumour genetic heterogeneity unravels, the development of robust and standardized methods for the assessment of circulating biomarkers will be essential for the realization of the potentials of personalized medicine. In this Review, we discuss the current status of blood-born biomarkers as surrogates for tissue-based biomarkers, and their burgeoning impact on the management of patients with breast cancer.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Antiphopholipid syndrome and some recurrent miscarriage-related endocrinological disorders can be effectively treated and new therapeutic approaches and the pleiotropic effects of old ones have led to improved fetal–maternal outcomes.
Abstract: Recurrent miscarriage is frustrating for the physician and a heartbreaking experience for the patient. Approximately 5% of couples trying to conceive have two consecutive miscarriages. Despite a thorough study of patients, the aetiology of this common obstetric complication is unknown in 50% of cases. Known causes include abnormal chromosomes, endocrinological disorders and uterine abnormalities. Although antiphospholipid antibodies have been demonstrated in miscarriages, the role played by alloimmune mechanisms remains unclear. New immunological approaches such as natural killer cells, regulatory T cells, tumour necrosis factor α, cell-derived microparticles, leptin, certain glycoproteins and cytokines should be considered. The management of thyroid diseases and immunological disorders is continuously evolving. Several genetic diagnostic procedures such as parental karyotyping and preimplantation genetic screening should probably not be used routinely. Antiphopholipid syndrome and some recurrent miscarriage-related endocrinological disorders can be effectively treated. Finally, new therapeutic approaches and the pleiotropic effects of old ones have led to improved fetal-maternal outcomes.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: PURPOSEGlofitamab as mentioned in this paper is a bispecific antibody possessing a 2:1 structure with bivalency for B cells and monovalency for CD3 on T cells.
Abstract: PURPOSEGlofitamab is a T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody possessing a novel 2:1 structure with bivalency for CD20 on B cells and monovalency for CD3 on T cells. This phase I study evaluated glofi...

169 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The objective was to develop an evidence‐based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS.
Abstract: Background and purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system. As new drugs are becoming available, knowledge on diagnosis and treatment must continuously evolve. There is therefore a need for a reference tool compiling current data on benefit and safety, to aid professionals in treatment decisions and use of resources across Europe. The European Committee of Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) have joined forces to meet this need. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS to guide healthcare professionals in the decision-making process. Methods: This guideline has been developed using the GRADE methodology and following the recently updated EAN recommendations for guideline development. Clinical questions were formulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) and outcomes were prioritized according to their relevance to clinical practice. An exhaustive literature search up to December 2016 was performed for each question and the evidence is presented narratively and, when possible, combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The quality of evidence for each outcome was rated into four categories – very high, high, low and very low − according to the risk of bias. GRADE evidence profiles were created using GRADEprofiler (GRADEpro) software (Version 3.6). The recommendations with assigned strength (strong, weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk−benefit balance. Consensus between the panellists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique. Results: A total of 10 questions have been agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency at the time of publication. A total of 20 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group members after three rounds of consensus.

169 citations


Authors

Showing all 2723 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
José Baselga156707122498
M. I. Martínez134125179885
Josep Tabernero11180368982
Jordi Rello10369435994
Xavier Montalban9576252842
James M. Downey9138129506
Enriqueta Felip8362253364
Joaquim Bellmunt8266041472
Joan Montaner8048922413
Marc Miravitlles7665125671
David H. Salat7524136779
Eduard Gratacós7553120178
Alex Rovira7435619586
Ramon Bataller7228319316
Maria Buti7149326596
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

89% related

VU University Medical Center
22.9K papers, 1.1M citations

88% related

Netherlands Cancer Institute
17.2K papers, 1.1M citations

88% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
202212
2021568
2020545
2019483
2018385