Hospital Universitario La Paz

About: Hospital Universitario La Paz is a healthcare organization based out in Madrid, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 8960 authors who have published 11499 publications receiving 191509 citations.

Global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning in rivers and riparian zones

Abstract: River ecosystems receive and process vast quantities of terrestrial organic carbon, the fate of which depends strongly on microbial activity. Variation in and controls of processing rates, however, are poorly characterized at the global scale. In response, we used a peer-sourced research network and a highly standardized carbon processing assay to conduct a global-scale field experiment in greater than 1000 river and riparian sites. We found that Earth’s biomes have distinct carbon processing signatures. Slow processing is evident across latitudes, whereas rapid rates are restricted to lower latitudes. Both the mean rate and variability decline with latitude, suggesting temperature constraints toward the poles and greater roles for other environmental drivers (e.g., nutrient loading) toward the equator. These results and data set the stage for unprecedented “next-generation biomonitoring” by establishing baselines to help quantify environmental impacts to the functioning of ecosystems at a global scale.

Immunophenotypic characterization and quantification of the epithelial inflammatory infiltrate in eosinophilic esophagitis through stereology: an analysis of the cellular mechanisms of the disease and the immunologic capacity of the esophagus.

Abstract: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging disease caused by dense infiltration of the esophageal epithelium by eosinophilic leucocytes. It is originated from local hypersensitivity to food or airborne allergens. Although the physiopathologic mechanisms of the illness have not been fully discovered, EE is a loss of immunologic tolerance by the esophagus, meaning that it should be considered as an active immunologic organ. In our study, we investigated the immunologic capacity of the epithelium using immunohistochemistry and stereology, to determine the cellular density of eosinophils, T and B lymphocytes, Langerhans cells, mast cells, and cells manufacturing immunoglobulin E in endoscopic biopsies of patients with EE (taken before and after topical treatment with fluticasone propionate) compared with normal individuals and patients suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We have observed that the density of eosinophils in EE is 300 times greater than in normal conditions and it is only in this disease where eosinophils show signs of activation and degranulation (positivity to major basic protein immunostaining). The number of T intraepithelial lymphocytes also significantly rose in EE, compared with other entities, where CD8 cells were predominant. However, the human esophagus is deficient in B lymphocytes and we only found intraepithelial plasma cells that excreted immunoglobulin E in EE. Under normal conditions mast cells exist in the thickness of the epithelium that are slightly higher in GERD and multiply in density by 17 in EE. Langerhans cells did not show any significant variation in density under the different tested conditions. After topical treatment with steroids, the density of the different cell components fell to similar levels to GERD. Using our study, we can conclude that the human esophagus may contribute to the development of local immunologic responses as it contains all the necessary cell components. EE represents growth of this esophageal capacity and its pathogeny could respond to mixed cellular and humoral mechanisms.

Dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral-therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results of the randomised, open label, non-inferiority GARDEL trial

Abstract: Summary Background Daily oral triple therapy is effective at halting HIV disease progression, but can have toxic effects and is costly. We investigated whether dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine is non-inferior to standard triple therapy. Methods The GARDEL study (Global AntiRetroviral Design Encompassing Lopinavir/r and Lamivudine vs LPV/r based standard therapy) is a 48 week, phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial in antiretroviral-therapy-naive adults (age ≥18 years) with documented HIV-1 RNA viral load of at least 1000 copies per mL. The study was done at 19 centres in six countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to dual therapy or triple therapy by sealed envelopes, in blocks of four, stratified by baseline viral load ( vs ≥100 000 copies per mL). Dual therapy consisted of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg plus lamivudine 150 mg, both twice daily. Triple therapy consisted of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg twice daily and lamivudine or emtricitabine plus another nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in fixed-dose combination. Efficacy was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was virological response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with HIV RNA less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks. Dual therapy was classed as non-inferior to triple therapy if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference between groups was no lower than −12%. Patients and investigators were unmasked to treatment allocation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01237444. Findings Between Dec 10, 2010, and May 15, 2012, 217 patients were randomly assigned to the dual-therapy group and 209 to the triple-therapy group. 198 patients in the dual-therapy group and 175 in the triple-therapy group completed 48 weeks of treatment. At week 48, 189 patients (88·3%) in the dual-therapy group and 169 (83·7%) in the triple-therapy group had viral response (difference 4·6%, 95% CI −2·2 to 11·8; p=0·171). Patients with baseline viral load of at least 100 000 copies per mL showed similar results (87·2% vs 77·9%, respectively; difference 9·3%, 95% CI −2·8 to 21·5; p=0·145). Toxicity-related or tolerability-related discontinuations were more common in the triple-therapy group (n=10 [4·9%]) than in the dual-therapy group (n=1 [0·4%]; difference 4·5%, 95% CI −8·1 to −0·9; p=0·011). 65 adverse events in the dual-therapy group and 88 in the triple-therapy group were possibly or probably drug related (p=0·007). Two serious adverse events occurred, both in the dual-therapy arm, one of which (a case of gastritis) was reported as possibly or probably related to drug treatment. Interpretation Dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine regimen warrants further clinical research and consideration as a potential therapeutic option for antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients. Funding Fundacion Huesped and AbbVie.

Dual treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression (OLE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Abstract: Summary Background Our objective was to assess therapeutic non-inferiority of dual treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir and lamivudine to triple treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus two nucleos(t)ides for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression. Methods In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients from 32 HIV units in hospitals in Spain and France. Eligible patients were HIV-infected adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL, for at least 6 months on triple treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir (twice daily) plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide, with no resistance or virological failure to these drugs, and no positive hepatitis B serum surface antigen. Investigators at each centre randomly assigned patients (1:1; block size of four; stratified by time to suppression [ 1 year] and nadir CD4 cell count [ 100 cells per μL]; computer-generated random sequence) to continue triple treatment or switch to dual treatment (oral lopinavir 400 mg and oral ritonavir 100 mg twice daily plus oral lamivudine 300 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was response to treatment in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients) at 48 weeks. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01471821. Findings Between Oct 1, 2011, and April 1, 2013, we randomly assigned 250 participants to continue triple treatment (127 [51%] patients) or switch to dual treatment (123 [49%] patients). In the intention-to-treat population, 110 (86·6%) of 127 patients in the triple-treatment group responded to treatment versus 108 (87·8%) of 123 in the dual-treatment group (difference −1·2% [95% CI −9·6 to 7·3]; p=0·92), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (7%) patients in the triple-treatment group and five (4%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·515), and study drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in four (3%) in the triple-treatment group and one (1%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·223). Interpretation Dual treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus lamivudine has non-inferior therapeutic efficacy and is similarly tolerated to triple treatment. Funding AbbVie and Red Tematica Cooperativa de Investigacion en Sida.

Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Patients with Previously Treated HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarkers

Abstract: Purpose: HER2-targeted therapy is not standard of care for HER2-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) This phase II study investigated efficacy and safety of the HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with previously treated advanced HER2-overexpressing NSCLC Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had HER2-overexpressing NSCLC (centrally tested IHC) and received previous platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted therapy in the case of EGFR mutation or ALK gene rearrangement Patients were divided into cohorts based on HER2 IHC (2+, 3+) All patients received T-DM1 36 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity The primary endpoint was investigator-determined overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST v11 Results: Forty-nine patients received T-DM1 (29 IHC 2+, 20 IHC 3+) No treatment responses were observed in the IHC 2+ cohort Four partial responses were observed in the IHC 3+ cohort (ORR, 20%; 95% confidence interval, 57%–437%) Clinical benefit rates were 7% and 30% in the IHC 2+ and 3+ cohorts, respectively Response duration for the responders was 29, 73, 83, and 108 months Median progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between cohorts Three of 4 responders had HER2 gene amplification No new safety signals were observed Conclusions: T-DM1 showed a signal of activity in patients with HER2-overexpressing (IHC 3+) advanced NSCLC Additional investigation into HER2 pathway alterations is needed to refine the target population for T-DM1 in NSCLC; however, HER2 IHC as a single parameter was an insufficient predictive biomarker