Institution
Media Research Center
About: Media Research Center is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Collaborative learning & Educational technology. The organization has 491 authors who have published 950 publications receiving 28581 citations. The organization is also known as: MRC.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
08 Jun 2009TL;DR: How SCAN tools facilitate and "institutionalize" the natural processes of becoming aware about social and cognitive variables, thereby leading to adaptive behavior in collaboration is described.
Abstract: SCAN tools (Social and Cognitive Awareness and Navigation tools) inform participants about social and/or cognitive variables with respect to a group and its members. This paper describes how SCAN tools facilitate and "institutionalize" the natural processes of becoming aware about social and cognitive variables, thereby leading to adaptive behavior in collaboration. The notion of person-object relations (PORs) is introduced as the basic building block underlying both group awareness and social navigation. Four design principles of SCAN tools (response formatting, juxtaposition, aggregation/transformation, and prediction/recommendation) are discussed, and their application in CSCL scenarios is described. Finally, issues for both practical implications and use-inspired basic research on SCAN mechanisms will be explored.
6 citations
01 Nov 2016
TL;DR: The authors discuss similarities and differences between Popper's three worlds theory and Moscovici's social representations theory, and point out that science does not take place within a separate'reified universe' in his ‘Social Psychology of======science' (1993).
Abstract: This paper is to my best of knowledge the first to discuss similarities and differences
between Karl Popper’s ‘three worlds theory’ and Serge Moscovici’s ‘theory of social
representations’. Karl Popper maintained that to be subject to criticism, and hence to
falsification attempts and subsequent improvement, scientific theories must first be
formulated, disseminated, perceived, and understood by others. As a result, such a
theory becomes a partially autonomous object of world 3, the “world of products of the
human mind” in contrast to world 1, the “world of things”, and world 2, the “world of
mental states” (Popper, 1978, p. 144). Popper’s three worlds theory resembles
Moscovici’s social representations theory insofar as social representations / world 3
objects cannot be reduced to individual states of minds, are embedded in interactions
between people and objects, and are always rooted in previous representations /
knowledge. Hence, Popper – who was very skeptical of the usefulness of a ‘psychology
of science’– did in fact employ elements of a ‘social’ social psychology of science in his
later works. Moscovici himself in turn may have failed to notice that to Popper science
does not take place within a separate ‘reified universe’ in his ‘Social Psychology of
Science’ (1993). Although to Popper science aims at increasing objectivity and
reification, it is still a part of the social world and the ‘consensual universe’.
6 citations
••
26 Jul 2010TL;DR: A tabletop is a useful shared space for diverse collaborative tasks if the tabletop is considered to be interface, then expression through visual sensation, especially 3D images, is an important way to engage the principal human sense.
Abstract: A tabletop is a useful shared space for diverse collaborative tasks. If the tabletop is considered to be interface, then expression through visual sensation, especially 3D images, is an important way to engage the principal human sense. Many 3D displays that can be observed from any direction have been proposed in recent years. However, some techniques force to wear special glasses and restrict the positions from which 3D images can be viewed [Kitamura et al. 2001]. Other glasses-free 3D displays employ obstructive apparatus on the table [Jones et al. 2007].
6 citations
••
13 Sep 2016
TL;DR: This issue of the journal has a new review study, a conceptual discussion with critical responses about the concept of scripts in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, and two articles with new insight about designs for low achievers and learning with epistemic games.
Abstract: In this issue of the journal, we have several new initiatives that we want to promote. The four articles consist of a new review study, a conceptual discussion with critical responses about the concept of scripts in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), and two articles with new insight about designs for low achievers and learning with epistemic games. We will also share some of the ideas, reflections, and stances in our field from the invited symposium that we organized at the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences in Singapore in June. Finally, the journal will launch a new format for contributions called Squibs (see the description at the end of this editorial). The intention with this format is that we as a community can engage in writing shorter contributions that raise awareness of competing theoretical or methodological developments, shortcomings, or new and emerging topics or issues in our field that we should address. As you see in the list of authors for this editorial, the former president of ISLS and associate editor in this journal, Carolyn P. Rose, has become one of the executive editors. We warmly welcome her in this position. The expertise that she brings to the Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2016) 11:255–262 DOI 10.1007/s11412-016-9242-6
6 citations
••
15 Jul 2009TL;DR: The integration of rubric functionalities in an editor compliant with the IMS Question and Test Interoperability specification (QTI) is proposed to facilitate the use of good techniques in computer assisted assessment.
Abstract: With the aim of facilitating teachers the use of good techniques in computer assisted assessment, this paper proposes the integration of rubric functionalities in an editor compliant with the IMS Question and Test Interoperability specification (QTI). Teachers can organize the information of an eQuestionnaire using the QTI-rubric approach. They canuse (and reuse) QTI elements without having a technical background or knowledge of the specification. The QTIrubric enables automatic formative feedback for learners and the results can serve them as a personal evidence of their knowledge and capabilities.
6 citations
Authors
Showing all 491 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Julian P T Higgins | 126 | 334 | 217988 |
David Spiegelhalter | 104 | 377 | 77315 |
Wen Gao | 88 | 1336 | 36100 |
Rachel Jewkes | 78 | 334 | 30950 |
Shiguang Shan | 76 | 475 | 23566 |
Xilin Chen | 75 | 544 | 24125 |
Gideon Lack | 73 | 261 | 20015 |
J. C. Gallagher | 71 | 251 | 17830 |
Michael J. Gait | 65 | 241 | 14134 |
Marcus Richards | 64 | 343 | 13851 |
Samuel B. Ho | 60 | 227 | 13077 |
Frank Fischer | 59 | 392 | 21021 |
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte | 56 | 207 | 20051 |
Michael M. Paparella | 50 | 378 | 9224 |
Chap T. Le | 46 | 208 | 9701 |