scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Media Research Center

About: Media Research Center is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Collaborative learning & Educational technology. The organization has 491 authors who have published 950 publications receiving 28581 citations. The organization is also known as: MRC.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
08 Jun 2009
TL;DR: How SCAN tools facilitate and "institutionalize" the natural processes of becoming aware about social and cognitive variables, thereby leading to adaptive behavior in collaboration is described.
Abstract: SCAN tools (Social and Cognitive Awareness and Navigation tools) inform participants about social and/or cognitive variables with respect to a group and its members. This paper describes how SCAN tools facilitate and "institutionalize" the natural processes of becoming aware about social and cognitive variables, thereby leading to adaptive behavior in collaboration. The notion of person-object relations (PORs) is introduced as the basic building block underlying both group awareness and social navigation. Four design principles of SCAN tools (response formatting, juxtaposition, aggregation/transformation, and prediction/recommendation) are discussed, and their application in CSCL scenarios is described. Finally, issues for both practical implications and use-inspired basic research on SCAN mechanisms will be explored.

6 citations

01 Nov 2016
TL;DR: The authors discuss similarities and differences between Popper's three worlds theory and Moscovici's social representations theory, and point out that science does not take place within a separate'reified universe' in his ‘Social Psychology of======science' (1993).
Abstract: This paper is to my best of knowledge the first to discuss similarities and differences between Karl Popper’s ‘three worlds theory’ and Serge Moscovici’s ‘theory of social representations’. Karl Popper maintained that to be subject to criticism, and hence to falsification attempts and subsequent improvement, scientific theories must first be formulated, disseminated, perceived, and understood by others. As a result, such a theory becomes a partially autonomous object of world 3, the “world of products of the human mind” in contrast to world 1, the “world of things”, and world 2, the “world of mental states” (Popper, 1978, p. 144). Popper’s three worlds theory resembles Moscovici’s social representations theory insofar as social representations / world 3 objects cannot be reduced to individual states of minds, are embedded in interactions between people and objects, and are always rooted in previous representations / knowledge. Hence, Popper – who was very skeptical of the usefulness of a ‘psychology of science’– did in fact employ elements of a ‘social’ social psychology of science in his later works. Moscovici himself in turn may have failed to notice that to Popper science does not take place within a separate ‘reified universe’ in his ‘Social Psychology of Science’ (1993). Although to Popper science aims at increasing objectivity and reification, it is still a part of the social world and the ‘consensual universe’.

6 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
26 Jul 2010
TL;DR: A tabletop is a useful shared space for diverse collaborative tasks if the tabletop is considered to be interface, then expression through visual sensation, especially 3D images, is an important way to engage the principal human sense.
Abstract: A tabletop is a useful shared space for diverse collaborative tasks. If the tabletop is considered to be interface, then expression through visual sensation, especially 3D images, is an important way to engage the principal human sense. Many 3D displays that can be observed from any direction have been proposed in recent years. However, some techniques force to wear special glasses and restrict the positions from which 3D images can be viewed [Kitamura et al. 2001]. Other glasses-free 3D displays employ obstructive apparatus on the table [Jones et al. 2007].

6 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Sep 2016
TL;DR: This issue of the journal has a new review study, a conceptual discussion with critical responses about the concept of scripts in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, and two articles with new insight about designs for low achievers and learning with epistemic games.
Abstract: In this issue of the journal, we have several new initiatives that we want to promote. The four articles consist of a new review study, a conceptual discussion with critical responses about the concept of scripts in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), and two articles with new insight about designs for low achievers and learning with epistemic games. We will also share some of the ideas, reflections, and stances in our field from the invited symposium that we organized at the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences in Singapore in June. Finally, the journal will launch a new format for contributions called Squibs (see the description at the end of this editorial). The intention with this format is that we as a community can engage in writing shorter contributions that raise awareness of competing theoretical or methodological developments, shortcomings, or new and emerging topics or issues in our field that we should address. As you see in the list of authors for this editorial, the former president of ISLS and associate editor in this journal, Carolyn P. Rose, has become one of the executive editors. We warmly welcome her in this position. The expertise that she brings to the Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2016) 11:255–262 DOI 10.1007/s11412-016-9242-6

6 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
15 Jul 2009
TL;DR: The integration of rubric functionalities in an editor compliant with the IMS Question and Test Interoperability specification (QTI) is proposed to facilitate the use of good techniques in computer assisted assessment.
Abstract: With the aim of facilitating teachers the use of good techniques in computer assisted assessment, this paper proposes the integration of rubric functionalities in an editor compliant with the IMS Question and Test Interoperability specification (QTI). Teachers can organize the information of an eQuestionnaire using the QTI-rubric approach. They canuse (and reuse) QTI elements without having a technical background or knowledge of the specification. The QTIrubric enables automatic formative feedback for learners and the results can serve them as a personal evidence of their knowledge and capabilities.

6 citations


Authors

Showing all 491 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Julian P T Higgins126334217988
David Spiegelhalter10437777315
Wen Gao88133636100
Rachel Jewkes7833430950
Shiguang Shan7647523566
Xilin Chen7554424125
Gideon Lack7326120015
J. C. Gallagher7125117830
Michael J. Gait6524114134
Marcus Richards6434313851
Samuel B. Ho6022713077
Frank Fischer5939221021
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte5620720051
Michael M. Paparella503789224
Chap T. Le462089701
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

82% related

Linköping University
50K papers, 1.5M citations

82% related

Radboud University Nijmegen
83K papers, 3.2M citations

81% related

City University of Hong Kong
60.1K papers, 1.7M citations

81% related

University of Ulm
51.1K papers, 1.6M citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202116
202022
201928
201831
201730
201641