scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Newcastle University

EducationNewcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
About: Newcastle University is a education organization based out in Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 31772 authors who have published 71187 publications receiving 2539147 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that the formation of the transient molten globule state occurs early on the pathway of folding of all globular proteins.

664 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the neuronal population associated with the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, the dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra, and try to understand how ageing puts these neurons at risk to the extent that a slight change in protein metabolism or mitochondrial function can push the cells over the edge leading to catastrophic cell death.

663 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cisplatin and radiotherapy should be used as the standard of care for HPV-positive low-risk patients who are able to tolerate cisplatin, and cetuximab showed significant detriment in terms of tumour control.

661 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive, integrated checklist of determinants of practice (the TICD checklist) is described that aims to be comprehensive and to build on the strengths of each of the 12 included checklists.
Abstract: Background: Determinants of practice are factors that might prevent or enable improvements. Several checklists, frameworks, taxonomies, and classifications of determinants of healthcare professional practice have been published. In this paper, we describe the development of a comprehensive, integrated checklist of determinants of practice (the TICD checklist). Methods: We performed a systematic review of frameworks of determinants of practice followed by a consensus process. We searched electronic databases and screened the reference lists of key background documents. Two authors independently assessed titles and abstracts, and potentially relevant full text articles. We compiled a list of attributes that a checklist should have: comprehensiveness, relevance, applicability, simplicity, logic, clarity, usability, suitability, and usefulness. We assessed included articles using these criteria and collected information about the theory, model, or logic underlying how the factors (determinants) were selected, described, and grouped, the strengths and weaknesses of the checklist, and the determinants and the domains in each checklist. We drafted a preliminary checklist based on an aggregated list of determinants from the included checklists, and finalized the checklist by a consensus process among implementation researchers. Results: We screened 5,778 titles and abstracts and retrieved 87 potentially relevant papers in full text. Several of these papers had references to papers that we also retrieved in full text. We also checked potentially relevant papers we had on file that were not retrieved by the searches. We included 12 checklists. None of these were completely comprehensive when compared to the aggregated list of determinants and domains. We developed a checklist with 57 potential determinants of practice grouped in seven domains: guideline factors, individual health professional factors, patient factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources, capacity for organisational change, and social, political, and legal factors. We also developed five worksheets to facilitate the use of the checklist. Conclusions: Based on a systematic review and a consensus process we developed a checklist that aims to be comprehensive and to build on the strengths of each of the 12 included checklists. The checklist is accompanied with five worksheets to facilitate its use in implementation research and quality improvement projects.

661 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The sequence of events in haematogenous metastasis from colonic carcinoma was analysed, and the findings are consistent with the cascade hypothesis that metastases develop in discrete steps, first in the liver, next in the lungs and finally, in other sites.
Abstract: The sequence of events in haematogenous metastasis from colonic carcinoma was analysed, using 1541 necropsy reports from 16 centres. The findings are consistent with the cascade hypothesis that metastases develop in discrete steps, first in the liver, next in the lungs and finally, in other sites. Deviations of necropsy findings from the cascade model are largely explained on the basis of false negative reports. In only 216 of 1194 cases was there suggestive evidence that metastatic patterns (excluding lymph nodes) were causally related to lymphatic or non-haematogenous pathways. The incidence of metastatic involvement in 'other' (quaternary) sites correlated with target organ blood-flow (ml min-) per g, only when bone marrow and thyroid were excluded. In the thyroid the incidence was lower than expected on the basis of blood flow per g tissue; this may indicate that the thyroid is an unfavourable site for metastatic growth of colonic carcinoma. In the bone marrow it is higher; the latter may be due to delivery of cancer cells via both arterial blood and the vertebral venous plexus. Recognition of this pattern of metastases in the bone marrow could be important with respect of diagnosis and therapy, in patients with colonic carcinoma.

659 citations


Authors

Showing all 32219 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Martin White1962038232387
Barry Halliwell173662159518
Adrian L. Harris1701084120365
Jorge E. Cortes1632784124154
Frank J. Gonzalez160114496971
David W. Bates1591239116698
Nicholas J. Talley158157190197
Hans Lassmann15572479933
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
Edmund T. Rolls15361277928
David J. Brooks152105694335
Andrew J. Lees14087791605
Daniel Thomas13484684224
Peter Hall132164085019
Paul Brennan132122172748
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

97% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

96% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

96% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

95% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023146
2022618
20214,765
20204,551
20194,318
20184,121