Institution
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Healthcare•Exeter, United Kingdom•
About: Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Exeter, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 2282 authors who have published 2526 publications receiving 78866 citations. The organization is also known as: RD&E.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This technique appears reliable in providing adequate sedation whilst maintaining cardiovascular and respiratory stability and would undertake the same procedure again if necessary.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of awake fibreoptic intubation using remifentanil sedation with topical anaesthesia limited only to the nasal mucosa. Twenty-four patients presenting for elective head and neck surgery were sedated using remifentanil titrated to effect and local anaesthetic was applied to the nasal mucosa. Vital signs were recorded throughout the procedure and both the anaesthetist and an observer rated the ease of the procedure. Intubation was successful in all patients and the procedure was rated as easy in 15 (63%) of patients. Mean arterial pressure remained within 8% of baseline in all cases and respiratory rate remained > 8 breaths.min(-1) in all but three patients. Although 56% of patients interviewed postoperatively said they recalled the procedure, all but one would undertake the same procedure again if necessary. This technique appears reliable in providing adequate sedation whilst maintaining cardiovascular and respiratory stability.
33 citations
••
33 citations
••
TL;DR: The differences observed between treatment groups in healing rates, symptomatic relief, and antacid consumption appear to result mainly from the patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis.
Abstract: Three-hundred and twenty-five patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis entered a double-blind, randomized multicentre study that compared 300 mg nizatidine b.d., 300 mg nocte and placebo. The 6- and 12-week treatment responses were studied. Healing was defined as complete epithelialization of all oesophageal lesions. The healing rates were 40% in the 300 mg nizatidine b.d. group, 30% in the 300 mg nocte group and 26% in the placebo group at 6 weeks. The corresponding figures after 12 weeks of treatment were 50%, 44% and 34%, respectively. The healing rates were significantly different (P less than 0.05) between the high-dose nizatidine group and placebo only, both at 6 and 12 weeks. Despite a trend at both 6 and 12 weeks in favour of 300 mg nizatidine nocte compared to placebo, this was not significantly different. The most important factor for the outcome, apart from the treatment group, was the pre-entry severity of oesophagitis. The differences observed between treatment groups in healing rates, symptomatic relief, and antacid consumption appear to result mainly from the patients with moderate and severe oesophagitis upon entry. Nizatidine (300 mg) b.d. appeared to be safe and effective in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.
33 citations
••
TL;DR: A case of spontaneous rupture of a liver cell adenoma is reported in a female transexual treated with methyl‐testosterone 150 mg daily for 7 years, and Histology showed peliosis hepatis also.
Abstract: A case of spontaneous rupture of a liver cell adenoma is reported in a female transexual treated with methyltestosterone 150 mg daily for 7 years. Emergency right hepatic lobectomy was performed successfully. Histology showed peliosis hepatis also. Emergency resection of a liver cell adenoma has been reported in a young woman taking oral contraceptives, and an elective resection in another female transexual treated with methyltestosterone. However, to the best of our knowledge this is the first case of emergency resection of a spontaneously ruptured liver cell adenoma in a transexual treated with long term methyltestosterone. Since there are numerous other patients similarly treated, it may be expected that this complication will be seen again.
33 citations
••
Cancer Research UK1, Imperial College London2, Hammersmith Hospital3, University College London4, University of Lausanne5, Royal North Shore Hospital6, Flinders University7, Monash University8, Ain Shams University9, University of Helsinki10, French Institute of Health and Medical Research11, Charité12, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart13, Tokyo Medical University14, Aichi Medical University15, King Abdulaziz Medical City16, Seoul National University Hospital17, Keimyung University18, University of Ulsan19, Inje University20, Cardiovascular Institute of the South21, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria22, VU University Medical Center23, Istanbul University24, University of Florence25, Conquest Hospital26, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital27, Anglia Ruskin University28, Emory University29, Veterans Health Administration30, Washington University in St. Louis31, Stony Brook University32, John Radcliffe Hospital33, Duke University34, Complutense University of Madrid35
TL;DR: iFR-guided deferral appears to be safe for patients with LAD lesions, and patients in whom iFR- guided deferral was performed had statistically significantly lower event rates than those with FFR-informed deferral.
33 citations
Authors
Showing all 2288 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Andrew T. Hattersley | 146 | 768 | 106949 |
Timothy M. Frayling | 133 | 500 | 100344 |
Gordon D.O. Lowe | 105 | 560 | 44327 |
Rod S Taylor | 104 | 524 | 39332 |
Sian Ellard | 97 | 636 | 36847 |
Zoltán Kutalik | 90 | 321 | 42901 |
Michael N. Weedon | 87 | 201 | 60701 |
Masud Husain | 81 | 398 | 25682 |
David Melzer | 80 | 328 | 33458 |
Jonathan Mill | 78 | 301 | 36343 |
A. John Camm | 76 | 368 | 49804 |
David Silver | 74 | 227 | 81103 |
Jason D. Warren | 73 | 384 | 20588 |
Nicholas J. Talbot | 71 | 240 | 29205 |
Andrew R. Wood | 70 | 214 | 36203 |