Institution
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics
About: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Productivity & Tourism. The organization has 251 authors who have published 533 publications receiving 16109 citations.
Topics: Productivity, Tourism, Business process management, Supply chain, Debt
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on six capabilities from a dynamic capabilities viewpoint, and investigate the level of deployment of each individual dynamic capability, and link this to firm performance, and provide an empirical contribution to the emerging work on dynamic capabilities through its detailed cross-case study.
Abstract: 1. INTRODUCTIONThe dynamic capabilities view (DCV) has emerged as an attempt to untangle the complex problem of sustainable competitive advantage in today's dynamic environment (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Teece, Pisano & Shuen, 1997). The underlying assumption is that firms, which are able to sense and then seize new opportunities and, further, reconfigure their resources and capabilities in line with recognized opportunities and environmental change can create and sustain a competitive advantage (Teece, 2012, 2009). Since the average period in which firms are able to sustain a competitive advantage has been decreasing over time (Wiggins & Ruefli, 2005), the issue of a sustained competitive advantage has become a critical concern of both academics and practitioners. Li and Liu's (2014) study of 217 firms shows that dynamic capabilities significantly positively affect competitive advantage, and that environmental dynamism is an important driver. Ambrosini and Bowman (2009) propose that fine-grained case studies of firms which have been able to sustain a competitive advantage over time in dynamic environments can offer some important guidelines on how to remain competitive in a world of intense competition.The paper's main purpose is to recognize dynamic capabilities as a source of competitive advantage in IT firms. Our focus was: (1) to study relevant firm capabilities from a dynamic capabilities viewpoint, their sensing, seizing and reconfiguring capabilities; and (2) to investigate the level of deployment of each individual dynamic capability, and to link this to firm performance. In order to examine the relationships involved, in-depth interviews were conducted in six representative firms in the IT industry. Due to the IT industry's specific nature, IT firms represent a suitable context to create and validate our research model. IT industry is also considered as one of the most changing and demanding sectors in today's environment. This paper draws attention to the promising avenues and potential offered by the dynamic capabilities view that encourages further development. In addition, it provides an empirical contribution to the emerging work on dynamic capabilities through its detailed cross-case study investigation. Finally, it offers some important practical implications.2. LITERATURE REVIEWThe publication written by Teece, Pisano and Shuen (1997) is recognized as the first seminal paper on the notion of dynamic capabilities. Evidently, the paper triggered a growing body of papers, namely more than 1,721 from 1997 to 2008 (Peteraf, DiStefano & Verona, 2013) in top management journals, and over 1,900 citations by December 2009 (DiStefano, Peteraf & Verona, 2010). However, the field still remains mostly conceptual and largely focuses on foundation-level issues (Helfat & Peteraf, 2009). Extensive literature reviews in recent years (e.g. Zahra et al., 2006; Wang & Ahmed, 2007; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009; Baretto, 2010; Peteraf, DiStefano and Verona, 2013) have not shown much progress as the field is still overflowing with a disconnected body of research. In addition, the DCV has received a lot of criticism (like other previous approaches such as the RBV) for being fuzzy and tautological (e.g. Winter, 2003) with little empirical support (Newbert, 2007; Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009). We propose that, if the DCV is useful as a field of study and, of course, for practitioners, then it needs to be fully researched, and should be expanded to other areas, such as the IS literature.Based on the literature review, six (6) capabilities were recognized as relevant firm capabilities (see Figure 1), and were further analyzed from the dynamic capabilities perspective. (1) Managers' dominant role in developing dynamic capabilities has been widely recognized (Helfat & Martin, 2014; Augier & Teece, 2009; Rindova & Kotha, 2001; Teece, 2007), especially in reconfiguring the resource base (Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009; Harreld, O'Reilly & Tushman, 2007; Moliterno & Wiersema, 2007). …
54 citations
•
TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed simulation study of the forecasting performance of diffusion index-based methods in short samples with structural change is conducted, where several data generation processes, to mimic different types of structural change, and compare the relative forecasting performance with more traditional time series methods and find that changes in the loading structure of the factors into the variables of interest are extremely important in determining the performance of factor models.
Abstract: We conduct a detailed simulation study of the forecasting performance of diffusion index-based methods in short samples with structural change. We consider several data generation processes, to mimic different types of structural change, and compare the relative forecasting performance of factor models and more traditional time series methods. We find that changes in the loading structure of the factors into the variables of interest are extremely important in determining the performance of factor models. We complement the analysis with an empirical evaluation of forecasts for the key macroeconomic variables of the Euro area and Slovenia, for which relatively short samples are officially available and structural changes are likely. The results are coherent with the findings of the simulation exercise, and confirm the relatively good performance of factor-based forecasts in short samples with structural change.
53 citations
••
01 Dec 2002TL;DR: This study investigates business process simulation as a tool for deriving new knowledge about current business processes, such as additional in-depth understanding of how the process is executed and identifying sources of the problems observed during the process execution.
Abstract: Business renovation is a key aspect of electronic business and a high-level strategy for managing change that generally cannot be handled by continuous improvement and organizational restructuring methods. Business process modeling and the evaluation of different alternative scenarios for improvement are usually the driving factors of the business reengineering process. This study investigates business process simulation as a tool for deriving new knowledge about current business processes, such as additional in-depth understanding of how the process is executed and identifying sources of the problems observed during the process execution. The main objective of the paper is to investigate the potential benefits and outcomes of e-business transitioning that can be assessed in advance by using simulation modeling. An example is presented of how simulation modeling can be used to understand a procurement process and evaluate how the proposed improvements and the introduction of electronic business will influence system performance.
53 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors demonstrate the applicability of agile project management in the context of product development, and encourage the introduction of agile techniques wherever proven to contribute to the success of the projects.
53 citations
••
TL;DR: The paper discusses the identification of the assets, the threats, the vulnerabilities of the ICT systems and provides an approach for the quantification of the necessary investment and concludes with a recommendation for a standard approach to security-information investment assessment.
53 citations
Authors
Showing all 251 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Larry Dwyer | 54 | 282 | 10945 |
Peter Trkman | 36 | 114 | 6641 |
Fabrizio Coricelli | 32 | 142 | 4223 |
Miha Škerlavaj | 27 | 93 | 3436 |
Aleš Popovič | 26 | 81 | 3337 |
Bostjan Antoncic | 25 | 61 | 6786 |
Irena Vida | 24 | 59 | 2010 |
Miroslav Verbič | 21 | 122 | 1427 |
Matej Černe | 21 | 78 | 1933 |
Vlado Dimovski | 20 | 114 | 1790 |
Tanja Mihalič | 20 | 57 | 2523 |
Mateja Drnovsek | 20 | 42 | 2543 |
Joze P. Damijan | 20 | 66 | 1566 |
Jože P. Damijan | 19 | 54 | 1743 |
Mojca Indihar Štemberger | 18 | 55 | 1762 |