scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors present seventeen articles dealing with social, economic and institutional dynamics of precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming or agriculture 4.0, and reveal new insights on the link between digital agriculture and farm diversity, new economic, business and institutional arrangements both on-farm, in the value chain and food system, and in the innovation system.
Abstract
While there is a lot of literature from a natural or technical sciences perspective on different forms of digitalization in agriculture (big data, internet of things, augmented reality, robotics, sensors, 3D printing, system integration, ubiquitous connectivity, artificial intelligence, digital twins, and blockchain among others), social science researchers have recently started investigating different aspects of digital agriculture in relation to farm production systems, value chains and food systems. This has led to a burgeoning but scattered social science body of literature. There is hence lack of overview of how this field of study is developing, and what are established, emerging, and new themes and topics. This is where this article aims to make a contribution, beyond introducing this special issue which presents seventeen articles dealing with social, economic and institutional dynamics of precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming or agriculture 4.0. An exploratory literature review shows that five thematic clusters of extant social science literature on digitalization in agriculture can be identified: 1) Adoption, uses and adaptation of digital technologies on farm; 2) Effects of digitalization on farmer identity, farmer skills, and farm work; 3) Power, ownership, privacy and ethics in digitalizing agricultural production systems and value chains; 4) Digitalization and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS); and 5) Economics and management of digitalized agricultural production systems and value chains. The main contributions of the special issue articles are mapped against these thematic clusters, revealing new insights on the link between digital agriculture and farm diversity, new economic, business and institutional arrangements both on-farm, in the value chain and food system, and in the innovation system, and emerging ways to ethically govern digital agriculture. Emerging lines of social science enquiry within these thematic clusters are identified and new lines are suggested to create a future research agenda on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0. Also, four potential new thematic social science clusters are also identified, which so far seem weakly developed: 1) Digital agriculture socio-cyber-physical-ecological systems conceptualizations; 2) Digital agriculture policy processes; 3) Digitally enabled agricultural transition pathways; and 4) Global geography of digital agriculture development. This future research agenda provides ample scope for future interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary science on precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations

TL;DR: A systematic review and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile were conducted to address the following objectives: (1) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, (2) identify limitations for DA adoption; and (3) summarise existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits as mentioned in this paper .
Journal ArticleDOI

The old, the new, or the old made new? Everyday counter-narratives of the so-called fourth agricultural revolution

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explore how farmers are engaging with technology in practice and show how these interactions problematise a simple, linear notion of innovation adoption and use, and reflect upon the contribution that the study of everyday encounters can make in setting more inclusionary, responsible pathways towards sustainable agriculture.

Modelling Digital Circular Economy framework in the Agricultural Sector. An Application in Southern Italy

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify a digital framework for collecting and sharing data fundamental for stakeholders with the purpose of implementing the best circular economy (CE) model in agriculture, based on the guidelines of the stakeholder engagement and through a survey, and the authors have mapped the lack of data and built a set by replicable sustainability indicators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Increased grain production of cultivated land by closing the existing cropping intensity gap in Southern China

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the changes in grain production by closing the cropping intensity gap (CIG) between realizable and actual cropping systems, and showed that closing the CIG of cultivated land in this region is the most effective way to increase grain production with lower environmental costs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Framing the response to IoT in agriculture: A discourse analysis

TL;DR: This article conducted a discourse analysis of 32 interviews with farmers in Ontario to understand the range of meanings associated with IoT by farmers and found that farmers respond to IoT in four categories: embrace, accept, ignore, and caution.
References
More filters
Book

Diffusion of Innovations

TL;DR: A history of diffusion research can be found in this paper, where the authors present a glossary of developments in the field of Diffusion research and discuss the consequences of these developments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diffusion of Innovations

Journal ArticleDOI

The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?

TL;DR: This article conducted an extensive literature review, employing bibliometric analysis and snowballing techniques to investigate the state of the art in the field and synthesise the similarities, differences and relationships between both terms.
Book

Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change

TL;DR: King of the road, the safety bicycle, the fourth kingdom, the social construction of bakelite, the majesty of daylight, fluorescent lighting conclusion, the politics of sociotechnical change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a service-dominant logic (S-D) for marketing and compare it with G-D to provide a framework for thinking more clearly about the concept of service and its role in exchange.
Related Papers (5)