scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors present seventeen articles dealing with social, economic and institutional dynamics of precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming or agriculture 4.0, and reveal new insights on the link between digital agriculture and farm diversity, new economic, business and institutional arrangements both on-farm, in the value chain and food system, and in the innovation system.
Abstract
While there is a lot of literature from a natural or technical sciences perspective on different forms of digitalization in agriculture (big data, internet of things, augmented reality, robotics, sensors, 3D printing, system integration, ubiquitous connectivity, artificial intelligence, digital twins, and blockchain among others), social science researchers have recently started investigating different aspects of digital agriculture in relation to farm production systems, value chains and food systems. This has led to a burgeoning but scattered social science body of literature. There is hence lack of overview of how this field of study is developing, and what are established, emerging, and new themes and topics. This is where this article aims to make a contribution, beyond introducing this special issue which presents seventeen articles dealing with social, economic and institutional dynamics of precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming or agriculture 4.0. An exploratory literature review shows that five thematic clusters of extant social science literature on digitalization in agriculture can be identified: 1) Adoption, uses and adaptation of digital technologies on farm; 2) Effects of digitalization on farmer identity, farmer skills, and farm work; 3) Power, ownership, privacy and ethics in digitalizing agricultural production systems and value chains; 4) Digitalization and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS); and 5) Economics and management of digitalized agricultural production systems and value chains. The main contributions of the special issue articles are mapped against these thematic clusters, revealing new insights on the link between digital agriculture and farm diversity, new economic, business and institutional arrangements both on-farm, in the value chain and food system, and in the innovation system, and emerging ways to ethically govern digital agriculture. Emerging lines of social science enquiry within these thematic clusters are identified and new lines are suggested to create a future research agenda on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0. Also, four potential new thematic social science clusters are also identified, which so far seem weakly developed: 1) Digital agriculture socio-cyber-physical-ecological systems conceptualizations; 2) Digital agriculture policy processes; 3) Digitally enabled agricultural transition pathways; and 4) Global geography of digital agriculture development. This future research agenda provides ample scope for future interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary science on precision farming, digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How key-enabling technologies’ regimes influence sociotechnical transitions: The impact of artificial intelligence on decarbonization in the steel industry

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors developed an approach to assess the socio-technical impact of a key enabling technologies (KET) regime on a transitioning sectoral regime, which is applied to the case of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) KET impacting the decarbonization of the energy-intensive steel industry.
Journal ArticleDOI

Farm advisors amid the transition to Agriculture 4.0: Professional identity, conceptions of the future and future‐specific competencies

- 26 Jan 2022 - 
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examine how Greek advisors experience the transition to and anticipate the future of agriculture 4.0, which are the new responsibility-related competency needs that this transition generates, and how conceptions of the future farming impact upon these needs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Robots and transformations of work in farm: a systematic review of the literature and a research agenda

TL;DR: In this article , a systematic review of work transformations subsequent to the adoption of agricultural robots on the farm is carried out, focusing on four dimensions of work: farm structure and the labor market; work organization; meaning of work; and technical-economic performances.
Journal ArticleDOI

Responsible digital agri‐food innovation in Australian and New Zealand public research organisations

TL;DR: In this article , the authors analyse digital agricultural technologies (agtech) innovation in two public research organisations in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand through the lens of responsible innovation (RI), and how corresponding activities were realized in practice.
References
More filters
Book

Diffusion of Innovations

TL;DR: A history of diffusion research can be found in this paper, where the authors present a glossary of developments in the field of Diffusion research and discuss the consequences of these developments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diffusion of Innovations

Journal ArticleDOI

The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?

TL;DR: This article conducted an extensive literature review, employing bibliometric analysis and snowballing techniques to investigate the state of the art in the field and synthesise the similarities, differences and relationships between both terms.
Book

Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change

TL;DR: King of the road, the safety bicycle, the fourth kingdom, the social construction of bakelite, the majesty of daylight, fluorescent lighting conclusion, the politics of sociotechnical change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a service-dominant logic (S-D) for marketing and compare it with G-D to provide a framework for thinking more clearly about the concept of service and its role in exchange.
Related Papers (5)