scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A systematic interim assessment of the Australian Government's Food and Health Dialogue.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Evaluated whether the Food and Health Dialogue, established by the Australian Government in 2009, is having an impact on reducing premature death and disability caused by poor diet in Australia.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether the Food and Health Dialogue (the Dialogue), established by the Australian Government in 2009, is having an impact on reducing premature death and disability caused by poor diet in Australia. Design and setting We used information derived from the Dialogue website, media releases, communiques and e-newsletters to evaluate the Dialogue's achievements from October 2009 to September 2013, using the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation and maintenance) framework. Data describing the processed foods marketed in Australia were extracted from an existing food composition database. Main outcome measures Achievements of the Dialogue (goals, targets, actions and health outcomes). Results The primary goal of the Dialogue was identified as "raising the nutritional profile of foods" to be achieved "through reformulation, consumer education and portion standardisation". Employing a public-private partnership model, the Dialogue has established a framework for collaboration between government, public health groups and industry. In the first 4 years, targets were set for 11 (8.9%) of a total of 124 possible action areas for food reformulation and portion standardisation. None were yet due to have been achieved. There was no evidence that any education programs had been implemented by the Dialogue. There are no indicators of the extent to which population exposure to target nutrients has changed or whether any positive or negative health impacts have ensued. Conclusions The Dialogue has highly creditable goals but the mechanism for delivering on them has proved inadequate. Explicit processes and the outcomes to be delivered within defined timelines are required, along with a clear plan for remediation if they are not achieved.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Strengthening of accountability systems to create healthy food environments and reduce global obesity

TL;DR: Strengthened accountability systems would support government leadership and stewardship, constrain the influence of private sector actors with major conflicts of interest on public policy development, and reinforce the engagement of civil society in creating demand for healthy food environments and in monitoring progress towards obesity action objectives.
Journal ArticleDOI

A proposed approach to systematically identify and monitor the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health using publicly available information

TL;DR: A framework for categorizing the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health is developed and an approach to systematically identify and monitor it is proposed to help redress any imbalance of interests and thereby contribute to the prevention and control of non‐communicable diseases.
Journal Article

Projected effect of dietary salt reductions on futurecardiovascular disease

G Coxson
TL;DR: Moderate reductions in dietary salt could substantially reduce cardiovascular events and medical costs and should be a public health target.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancing the Right to Health--The Vital Role of Law.

TL;DR: The report provides guidance about issues and requirements to be addressed during the process of developing public health laws and includes case studies and examples of legislation from a variety of countries to illustrate effective law reform practices and some features of effective public health legislation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Healthy people and healthy profits? Elaborating a conceptual framework for governing the commercial determinants of non-communicable diseases and identifying options for reducing risk exposure

TL;DR: Reforms are identified that will be needed to the global health architecture to govern NCD risks, including to strengthen its ability to consolidate the collective power of diverse stakeholders, its authority to develop and enforce clear measures to address risks, as well as establish monitoring and rights-based accountability systems across all actors to drive measurable, equitable and sustainable progress.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

TL;DR: A model for evaluating public health interventions that assesses 5 dimensions: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, implementation and maintenance is proposed (termed the RE-AIM model).
Journal ArticleDOI

Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis

TL;DR: The Lancet NCD Action Group and the NCD Alliance propose five overarching priority actions for the response to the crisis and the delivery of five priority interventions--tobacco control, salt reduction, improved diets and physical activity, reduction in hazardous alcohol intake, and essential drugs and technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries

TL;DR: This paper assess the eff ectiveness of self-regulation, public-private partnerships, and public regulation models of interaction with unhealthy commodity industries and conclude that unhealthy commodity industry should have no role in the formation of national or international NCD policy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Projected Effect of Dietary Salt Reductions on Future Cardiovascular Disease

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Policy Model to quantify the benefits of potentially achievable, population-wide reductions in dietary salt of up to 3 g per day (1200 mg of sodium per day).

Chronic Diseases: Chronic Diseases and Development 5 Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: progress and capacity in high-burden countries

TL;DR: A framework for monitoring of such diseases is outlined and the mortality burden and the capacity of countries to respond to them are reviewed and it is shown that capacity for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases is inadequate.
Related Papers (5)