scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Peter F. Thall
- 01 May 2010 - 
- Vol. 25, Iss: 2, pp 227-244
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper will review several Bayesian early phase trial designs that were tailored to accommodate specific complexities of the treatment regime and patient outcomes in particular clinical settings.
Abstract
An early phase clinical trial is the first step in evaluating the effects in humans of a potential new anti-disease agent or combination of agents. Usually called “phase I” or “phase I/II” trials, these experiments typically have the nominal scientific goal of determining an acceptable dose, most often based on adverse event probabilities. This arose from a tradition of phase I trials to evaluate cytotoxic agents for treating cancer, although some methods may be applied in other medical settings, such as treatment of stroke or immunological diseases. Most modern statistical designs for early phase trials include model-based, outcome-adaptive decision rules that choose doses for successive patient cohorts based on data from previous patients in the trial. Such designs have seen limited use in clinical practice, however, due to their complexity, the requirement of intensive, computer-based data monitoring, and the medical community’s resistance to change. Still, many actual applications of model-based outcome-adaptive designs have been remarkably successful in terms of both patient benefit and scientific outcome. In this paper, I will review several Bayesian early phase trial designs that were tailored to accommodate specific complexities of the treatment regime and patient outcomes in particular clinical settings.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Current challenges in clinical development of “targeted therapies”: the case of acute myeloid leukemia

TL;DR: This work advocates earlier inclusion of combinations ± chemotherapy and of newly diagnosed patients into clinical trials and suggests newer preclinical models including "organoids" and combinations of pharmacologic and genetic approaches may better align models with human AML.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies

TL;DR: This work describes the methods available and discusses some of the opportunities and challenges faced in dual-agent phase I trials, as well as giving examples of trials in which adaptive designs have been implemented successfully.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using Joint Utilities of the Times to Response and Toxicity to Adaptively Optimize Schedule–Dose Regimes

TL;DR: A Bayesian two‐stage phase I–II design for optimizing administration schedule and dose of an experimental agent based on the times to response and toxicity in the case where schedules are non‐nested and qualitatively different is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial

TL;DR: EffTox is an efficient and powerful design, but not without its challenges, and joint phase I/II clinical trial designs will likely become increasingly important in coming years as they further investigate non-cytotoxic treatments and streamline the drug approval process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-Based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials

TL;DR: In this article, similarities and differences between the dose-finding and the stochastic approximation literatures are explored and light is shed on the present and future relevance of stoChastic approximation to dose- Finding clinical trials.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data

TL;DR: In this paper, exact Bayesian methods for modeling categorical response data are developed using the idea of data augmentation, which can be summarized as follows: the probit regression model for binary outcomes is seen to have an underlying normal regression structure on latent continuous data, and values of the latent data can be simulated from suitable truncated normal distributions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

TL;DR: A new approach to the design and analysis of Phase 1 clinical trials in cancer and a particularly simple model is looked at that enables the use of models whose only requirements are that locally they reasonably well approximate the true probability of toxic response.
Journal ArticleDOI

One Degree of Freedom for Non-Additivity

John W. Tukey
- 01 Sep 1949 - 
TL;DR: The present writer is usually much more concerned with and worried about non-additivity, and until recently has suffered from the lack of a systematic way to seek it out, and then to measure it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

TL;DR: A simulation study shows the method's accuracy and safety are comparable with CRM's while the former takes a much shorter trial duration: a trial that would take up to 12 years to complete by the CRM could be reduced to 2–4 years by the TITE‐CRM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies

TL;DR: Modifications to the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) are presented, in which one assigns more than one subject at a time to each dose level, and each dose increase is limited to one level, which makes the CRM acceptable to clinical investigators.
Related Papers (5)