scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies

TLDR
It is demonstrated that power for 2SLS MR can be derived using the non-centrality parameter (NCP) of the statistical test that is employed to test whether the two-stage least squares regression coefficient is zero and represented theoretically using this NCP-based approach.
Abstract
In Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, where genetic variants are used as proxy measures for an exposure trait of interest, obtaining adequate statistical power is frequently a concern due to the small amount of variation in a phenotypic trait that is typically explained by genetic variants. A range of power estimates based on simulations and specific parameters for two-stage least squares (2SLS) MR analyses based on continuous variables has previously been published. However there are presently no specific equations or software tools one can implement for calculating power of a given MR study. Using asymptotic theory, we show that in the case of continuous variables and a single instrument, for example a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or multiple SNP predictor, statistical power for a fixed sample size is a function of two parameters: the proportion of variation in the exposure variable explained by the genetic predictor and the true causal association between the exposure and outcome variable. We demonstrate that power for 2SLS MR can be derived using the non-centrality parameter (NCP) of the statistical test that is employed to test whether the 2SLS regression coefficient is zero. We show that the previously published power estimates from simulations can be represented theoretically using this NCP-based approach, with similar estimates observed when the simulation-based estimates are compared with our NCP-based approach. General equations for calculating statistical power for 2SLS MR using the NCP are provided in this note, and we implement the calculations in a web-based application.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

TL;DR: An adaption of Egger regression can detect some violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions, and provide an effect estimate which is not subject to these violations, and provides a sensitivity analysis for the robustness of the findings from a Mendelian randomization investigation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies

TL;DR: Developments of MR, including two-sample MR, bidirectional MR, network MR, two-step MR, factorial MR and multiphenotype MR, are outlined in this review.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets

TL;DR: A method is proposed that integrates summary-level data from GWAS with data from expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) studies to identify genes whose expression levels are associated with a complex trait because of pleiotropy, and prioritize 126 genes that provide important leads to design future functional studies.

Mendelianrandomization:geneticanchorsforcausal inference in epidemiological studies

TL;DR: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a method that utilizes genetic variants that are robustly associated with such modifiable exposures to generate more reliable evidence regarding which interventions should produce health benefits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic

TL;DR: The proposed approach for a two-sample summary data MR analysis to estimate the causal effect of low-density lipoprotein on heart disease risk is demonstrated and care must be taken to assess the NOME assumption via the IGX2 statistic before implementing standard MR-Egger regression in the two- sample summary data context.
References
More filters
Book

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data

TL;DR: This is the essential companion to Jeffrey Wooldridge's widely-used graduate text Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2001).
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?

TL;DR: Mendelian randomization provides new opportunities to test causality and demonstrates how investment in the human genome project may contribute to understanding and preventing the adverse effects on human health of modifiable exposures.
Posted Content

A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments

TL;DR: Weak instruments arise when the instruments in linear instrumental variables (IV) regression are weakly correlated with the included endogenous variables as mentioned in this paper, and weak instruments correspond to weak identification of some or all of the unknown parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments

TL;DR: Weak instruments arise when the instruments in linear instrumental variables (IV) regression are weakly correlated with the included endogenous variables as discussed by the authors, and weak instruments correspond to weak identification of some or all of the unknown parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology.

TL;DR: The use of germline genetic variants that proxy for environmentally modifiable exposures as instruments for these exposures is one form of IV analysis that can be implemented within observational epidemiological studies and can be considered as analogous to randomized controlled trials.
Related Papers (5)