Changes and correlates of screen time in adults and children during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of major databases was undertaken for studies published from inception to 06/12/2021, using a pre-published protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021261422) as discussed by the authors .About:
This article is published in EClinicalMedicine.The article was published on 2022-05-21 and is currently open access. It has received 46 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Medicine & Medicine.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Impact of Digital Screen Time on Dietary Habits and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents
Agata Rocka,Faustyna Jasielska,Dominika Katarzyna Madras,Paulina Krawiec,Elżbieta Pac-Kożuchowska +4 more
TL;DR: The majority of children were exposed to screens during meals, which is a risk factor of obesity, and the promotion of the judicious use of digital devices and healthy dietary habits associated with the use of screens may be an important component of obesity prevention strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI
The prevalence of sensory changes in post-COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
TL;DR: Considering that changes in the sensory organs are associated with decreases in quality of life, future research should examine the etiology behind the persistent symptoms of Post-COVID syndrome.
Journal ArticleDOI
Daily exposure to virtual nature reduces symptoms of anxiety in college students
M. Browning,Seung-Soo Shin,Gabrielle Drong,Olivia McAnirlin,Ryan J. Gagnon,Shyam Ranganathan,Kailan Sindelar,David Hoptman,Gregory N. Bratman,Shuai Yuan,V. Prabhu,Wendy Heller +11 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors studied the influence of daily virtual nature intervention on symptoms of anxiety, depression, and an underlying cause of poor mental health: rumination, and found that virtual nature did not help symptoms of anhedonic depression or rumination.
Journal ArticleDOI
Raising the Child—Do Screen Media Help or Hinder? The Quality over Quantity Hypothesis
TL;DR: In this article , a review aimed at gathering current knowledge on the correlations of different screen media use and development outcomes, as well as providing an overview of potential benefits that new technologies may provide to the pediatric population.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mental Health and COVID-19 in University Students: Findings from a Qualitative, Comparative Study in Italy and the UK
Ilaria Riboldi,Chiara Alessandra Capogrosso,Susanna Piacenti,Angela Calabrese,Susanna Lucini Paioni,Francesco Bartoli,Cristina Crocamo,Giuseppe Carrà,Jocelyn W. Armes,Cath Taylor +9 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored feelings and perspectives about the impact of the pandemic on mental health, comparing students from Italy and the UK, and developed an explanatory model from four themes identified across 33 interviews: anxiety exacerbated by COVID-19; putative mechanisms leading to poor mental health; most vulnerable subgroups; and coping strategies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.