scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index: A retrospective study on 3655 measures.

TLDR
Comparing body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index (BMI) in a large cohort suggests that BIA and DXA methods are interchangeable at a population level, irrespective of BMI.
Abstract
Background and aims Body composition assessment is often used in clinical practice for nutritional evaluation and monitoring. The standard method, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is hardly feasible in routine clinical practice contrary to Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) method. We thus aimed to compare body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index (BMI) in a large cohort. Methods Retrospectively, we analysed DXA and BIA measures in patients followed in a Nutrition Unit from 2010 to 2016. Body composition was assessed under standardized conditions in the morning, after a fasting period of 12 h, by DXA (Lunar Prodigy Advance) and BIA (Bodystat QuadScan 4000, Manufacturer’s equation). Bland-Altman test was performed for each class of BMI (kg/m2) and fat mass and fat free mass values were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Pearson correlations were also performed and the concordance coefficient of Lin was calculated. Results Whatever the BMI, BIA and DXA methods reported higher concordance for values of FM than FFM. Body composition values were very closed for patients with BMI between 16 and 18,5 (difference 18,5 and BMI < 40, BIA overestimated fat free mass from 3,38 to 8,28 kg, and underestimated fat mass from 2,51 to 5,67 kg compared with DXA method. For BMI ≥ 40, differences vary with BMI. For BMI < 16, BIA underestimated fat free mass by 2,25 kg, and overestimated fat mass by 2,57 kg. However, limits of agreement were very large either for FM and FFM values, irrespective of BMI. Conclusion The small bias, particularly in patients with BMI between 16 and 18, suggests that BIA and DXA methods are interchangeable at a population level. However, concordance between BIA and DXA methods at the individual level is lacking, irrespective of BMI.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

D3 -Creatine dilution and the importance of accuracy in the assessment of skeletal muscle mass.

TL;DR: The assessment of skeletal muscle mass using the D3‐Cr dilution method in prospective cohort studies may reveal sarcopenia as a powerful risk factor for late life disability and chronic disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex Differences of Vitamin D Status across BMI Classes: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study.

TL;DR: It is suggested that 25OHD concentrations were lower in females than males across all BMI categories, which can be explained by the fact that females have a higher amount of fat than males.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relation of body fat mass and fat-free mass to total mortality: results from 7 prospective cohort studies.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used Cox regression and restricted cubic splines to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the relation of body composition, measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis, to total mortality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Harnessing Muscle-Liver Crosstalk to Treat Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

TL;DR: The role of skeletal muscle in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been explored in a recent perspective review as discussed by the authors, which showed that sarcopenia is an effect-modifier across the NAFLD spectrum in that it is tightly linked to an increased risk of NAL, NASH, and advanced liver fibrosis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

TL;DR: A new reproducibility index is developed and studied that is simple to use and possesses desirable properties and the statistical properties of this estimate can be satisfactorily evaluated using an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment methods in human body composition

TL;DR: There is an ongoing need to perfect methods that provide information beyond mass and structure (static measures) to kinetic measures that yield information on metabolic and biological functions.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are the methods for measuring body composition in humans?

Methods for measuring body composition in humans include Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA), with DXA being the standard method but less feasible in routine clinical practice compared to BIA.