scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Comparison of performance in metalinguistic tasks among students with and without risk of dyslexia

TLDR
In this paper, the authors evaluated the performance of students with and without risk of dyslexia in metalinguistic tasks and found that the students at risk showed an increase in the mean of performance after the intervention.
Abstract
Introduction: Studies on students at risk for dyslexia have increased  as well as the interest in verifying whether tasks involving a phonological basis can favor the performance of these students in the initial literacy process. Objective :Evaluate the performance of students with and without risk of dyslexia in metalinguistic tasks. Methods : Participants of this study were 40 students, aged between 5-6 years, enrolled in the 1 st year of elementary school, divided into two groups, GI: composed of 20 students without risk of dyslexia and GII: composed of 20 students at risk of dyslexia, both groups were submitted to the Evaluation Cognitive Linguistic Skills Protocol - collective and individual version (adapted), and phonological intervention composed of tasks of relation letter/sound alphabet in sequence and in random order, rhyme, identification and manipulation of words, identification and production of syllables, syllabic segmentation and analysis, identification and phonemic segmentation, substitution, synthesis, analysis and phonemic discrimination. Results : Indicated that the students from GI and GII showed statistically superior performance in the post testing compared to the performance obtained in the pre testing. Conclusion : The students at risk of dyslexia showed an increase in the mean of performance after the intervention, however, when compared with the performance of the students without risk for dyslexia, they presented inferior performance, indicating that, even after have underwent  to the intervention, they did not reach the mean of performance of students without risk for dyslexia in metalinguistic tests.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated students' ORF with a 1-min fluency measure to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile.
Journal ArticleDOI

Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare vocabulary performances and verify the lexical competence of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write using the Mann-Whitney test with a p-value ≤ 0.05, and find that students with difficulties learning reading and writing had greater difficulties in usual word designation, as well as higher error indexes in substitution processes and non-designation, revealing a deficient vocabulary concerning lexical access in comparison with students without difficulties.
Journal ArticleDOI

The performance of elementary public and private school students pre and post phonological intervention

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the performance of pre and post phonological intervention for 2nd year students in public and private education, with and without learning disabilities, using the Linguistic Cognitive Skills Assessment Protocol Adaptive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early screening of reading and writing difficulties in the first grade - a pilot study

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the effectiveness of an early identification screening based on the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) test, 6th edition, to early identify first graders at risk of dyslexia.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children.

TL;DR: Children's facility in “automatization” of naming different semantic categories is considered in terms of the contributions of overlearning, stimulus discriminability, “operativity”, word frequency and response competition; only the last two appear to be explanatory factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties

TL;DR: RTI processes potentially integrate general and special education and suggest new directions for research and public policy related to LDs, but the scaling issues in schools are significant and more research is needed on the use of RTI data for identification.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study

TL;DR: Tests of structural invariance show that models of early literacy development are highly transferable across languages and results demonstrated that RAN was more related to reading than spelling across orthographies, with the opposite pattern shown for PA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional characteristics of developmental dyslexia in left-hemispheric posterior brain regions predate reading onset.

TL;DR: Differences in neural correlates of phonological processing in individuals with DD are not a result of reading failure, but are present before literacy acquisition starts, suggesting that compensatory mechanisms for reading failure are not yet present.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties.

TL;DR: A relatively compact code-focused intervention can address the needs of children with weaknesses in both phonological awareness and letter knowledge, indicating instructional needs in all areas of weakness for young children at risk for later reading difficulties.
Related Papers (5)