CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The 2010 version of the CONSORT Statement is described, which updates the previous reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulated experience.Abstract:
Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the 2010 version of the CONSORT Statement, which updates the previous reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulated experience.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
Kusala Pussegoda,Lucy Turner,Chantelle Garritty,Chantelle Garritty,Alain Mayhew,Becky Skidmore,Adrienne Stevens,Adrienne Stevens,Isabelle Boutron,Rafael Sarkis-Onofre,Lise M. Bjerre,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Douglas G. Altman,David Moher +13 more
TL;DR: The aims of this study are to identify reports assessing the methodological quality (MQ) and/or reporting quality (RQ) of a cohort of SRs and to assess their number, general characteristics, and approaches to ‘quality’ assessment over time.
Journal ArticleDOI
Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: an ACTTION systematic review.
Shannon M. Smith,R. Daniel Chang,Anthony Pereira,Nirupa Shah,Ian Gilron,Nathaniel P. Katz,Allison H. Lin,Michael P. McDermott,Bob A. Rappaport,Michael C. Rowbotham,Cristina Sampaio,Dennis C. Turk,Robert H. Dworkin +12 more
TL;DR: Assessing harms reporting in 3 major pain journals to determine whether harms reporting improved following publication of the 2004 CONSORT recommendations and to examine study factors associated with adequacy of harms reporting found greater improvement is needed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrothermal and ultrasonic devices for abdominal surgical hemostasis: a systematic review
TL;DR: Vessel-sealing devices may be considered safe and their use may reduce costs due to reduced blood loss and shorter operating time in some abdominal surgical procedures compared to mono- or bipolar electrothermal devices.
Journal ArticleDOI
Implementation Science: A Neglected Opportunity to Accelerate Improvements in the Safety and Quality of Surgical Care.
TL;DR: Improvements in the safety and quality of surgical care can be accelerated by drawing more heavily upon implementation science and that until this rapidly evolving field becomes more firmly embedded into surgical research and implementation efforts, understanding of why interventions such as the checklist “work” in some settings and appear “not to work’ in other settings will be limited.
Journal ArticleDOI
Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study
Adrià Jorba-García,Rui Figueiredo,Albert González-Barnadas,Octavi Camps-Font,Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón +4 more
TL;DR: Dynamic computer assisted surgery systems allow more accurate implant placement in comparison with the conventional freehand method, regardless of the surgeon’s experience, and this system seems to offer more advantages to novice professionals.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
E von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
David Moher,Sally Hopewell,Kenneth F. Schulz,Victor M. Montori,Peter C Gøtzsche,Philip J. Devereaux,Diana Elbourne,Matthias Egger,Douglas G. Altman +8 more
TL;DR: This update of the CONSORT statement improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias.