CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The 2010 version of the CONSORT Statement is described, which updates the previous reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulated experience.Abstract:
Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the 2010 version of the CONSORT Statement, which updates the previous reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulated experience.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
Larissa Shamseer,David Moher,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G. Shekelle,Lesley A. Stewart +7 more
TL;DR: The PRISMA-P checklist as mentioned in this paper provides 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol, as well as a model example from an existing published protocol.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
TL;DR: Most of the papers surveyed did not report using randomisation or blinding to reduce bias in animal selection and outcome assessment, consistent with reviews of many research areas, including clinical studies, published in recent years.
Journal ArticleDOI
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
David Moher,Sally Hopewell,Kenneth F. Schulz,Victor M. Montori,Peter C Gøtzsche,Philip J. Devereaux,Diana Elbourne,Matthias Egger,Douglas G. Altman +8 more
TL;DR: This update of the CONSORT statement improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines
TL;DR: An accurate summary of the background, research objectives, including details of the species or strain of animal used, key methods, principal findings and conclusions of the study is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Johannes B. Reitsma,David E. Bruns,Constantine Gatsonis,Paul Glasziou,Les Irwig,Jeroen G. Lijmer,David Moher,David Moher,Drummond Rennie,Henrica C.W. de Vet,Herbert Y. Kressel,Nader Rifai,Robert M. Golub,Douglas G. Altman,Lotty Hooft,Daniël A. Korevaar,Jérémie F. Cohen,Jérémie F. Cohen +18 more
TL;DR: STARD 2015 is presented, an updated list of 30 essential items that should be included in every report of a diagnostic accuracy study, which incorporates recent evidence about sources of bias and variability in diagnostic accuracy.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Commentary: Measuring the success of blinding in RCTs: don’t, must, can’t or needn’t?
TL;DR: This issue presents an analysis of the success of blinding in a random sample of entries in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and an alternate view begins by relegating blinding to the level of process, rather than an end in itself.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials: An Experiment and a Call for Responses From Readers
TL;DR: It is found that when the treatment allocation was inadequately concealed from study participants and investigators, when the effect of a therapy was thwarted if allocation of patients is not random.
Journal Article