Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques

TLDR: In this article, a comprehensive set of recommendations that can be used to give researchers in MIS and the behavioral sciences a framework for developing valid measures is presented. But the scale development and validation of constructs is still a challenging activity.

Abstract: Despite the fact that validating the measures of constructs is critical to building cumulative knowledge in MIS and the behavioral sciences, the process of scale development and validation continues to be a challenging activity Undoubtedly, part of the problem is that many of the scale development procedures advocated in the literature are limited by the fact that they (1) fail to adequately discuss how to develop appropriate conceptual definitions of the focal construct, (2) often fail to properly specify the measurement model that relates the latent construct to its indicators, and (3) underutilize techniques that provide evidence that the set of items used to represent the focal construct actually measures what it purports to measure Therefore, the purpose of the present paper is to integrate new and existing techniques into a comprehensive set of recommendations that can be used to give researchers in MIS and the behavioral sciences a framework for developing valid measures First, we briefly elaborate upon some of the limitations of current scale development practices Following this, we discuss each of the steps in the scale development process while paying particular attention to the differences that are required when one is attempting to develop scales for constructs with formative indicators as opposed to constructs with reflective indicators Finally, we discuss several things that should be done after the initial development of a scale to examine its generalizability and to enhance its usefulness