scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings Article

Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processes

TLDR
The exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs is derived and it is found that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite- width networks.
Abstract
It has long been known that a single-layer fully-connected neural network with an i.i.d. prior over its parameters is equivalent to a Gaussian process (GP), in the limit of infinite network width. This correspondence enables exact Bayesian inference for infinite width neural networks on regression tasks by means of evaluating the corresponding GP. Recently, kernel functions which mimic multi-layer random neural networks have been developed, but only outside of a Bayesian framework. As such, previous work has not identified that these kernels can be used as covariance functions for GPs and allow fully Bayesian prediction with a deep neural network. In this work, we derive the exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs. We further develop a computationally efficient pipeline to compute the covariance function for these GPs. We then use the resulting GPs to perform Bayesian inference for wide deep neural networks on MNIST and CIFAR-10. We observe that trained neural network accuracy approaches that of the corresponding GP with increasing layer width, and that the GP uncertainty is strongly correlated with trained network prediction error. We further find that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite-width networks. Finally we connect the performance of these GPs to the recent theory of signal propagation in random neural networks.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Simplicity Bias in Transformers and their Ability to Learn Sparse Boolean Functions

TL;DR: The authors conducted an extensive empirical study on Boolean functions to demonstrate the following: (i) Random Transformers are relatively more biased towards functions of low sensitivity, with Transformers ultimately converging to functions of lower sensitivity.
Posted Content

FedLoc: Federated Learning Framework for Cooperative Localization and Location Data Processing.

TL;DR: The obtained primary results confirm that the proposed FedLoc framework well suits data-driven, machine learning-based localization and spatio-temporal data modeling.
Posted Content

Which Minimizer Does My Neural Network Converge To

TL;DR: This work explains how common variants of the standard NN training procedure change the minimizer obtained and demonstrates that for adaptive optimization such as AdaGrad, the obtained minimizer generally differs from the gradient descent (GD) minimizer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep Gaussian process based multi-speaker speech synthesis with latent speaker representation

TL;DR: In this paper, a deep Gaussian process (DGP)-based framework for multi-speaker speech synthesis and speaker representation learning is proposed, where the speaker similarity is expressed in terms of the similarity of the speaker representations and the voices of similar speakers are efficiently modeled.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Investigating Generalization by Controlling Normalized Margin

TL;DR: It is suggested that networks can be produced where normalized margin has seemingly no relationship with generalization, counter to the theory of Bartlett et al. (2017), and that yes — in a standard training setup, test performance closely tracks normalized margin.
References
More filters
Proceedings Article

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

TL;DR: This work introduces Adam, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions, based on adaptive estimates of lower-order moments, and provides a regret bound on the convergence rate that is comparable to the best known results under the online convex optimization framework.
Book

Bayesian learning for neural networks

TL;DR: Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks shows that Bayesian methods allow complex neural network models to be used without fear of the "overfitting" that can occur with traditional neural network learning methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression

TL;DR: A new unifying view, including all existing proper probabilistic sparse approximations for Gaussian process regression, relies on expressing the effective prior which the methods are using, and highlights the relationship between existing methods.
Journal Article

In Defense of One-Vs-All Classification

TL;DR: It is argued that a simple "one-vs-all" scheme is as accurate as any other approach, assuming that the underlying binary classifiers are well-tuned regularized classifiers such as support vector machines.
Proceedings Article

Gaussian processes for Big data

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce stochastic variational inference for Gaussian process models, which enables the application of Gaussian Process (GP) models to data sets containing millions of data points.