scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings Article

Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processes

TLDR
The exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs is derived and it is found that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite- width networks.
Abstract
It has long been known that a single-layer fully-connected neural network with an i.i.d. prior over its parameters is equivalent to a Gaussian process (GP), in the limit of infinite network width. This correspondence enables exact Bayesian inference for infinite width neural networks on regression tasks by means of evaluating the corresponding GP. Recently, kernel functions which mimic multi-layer random neural networks have been developed, but only outside of a Bayesian framework. As such, previous work has not identified that these kernels can be used as covariance functions for GPs and allow fully Bayesian prediction with a deep neural network. In this work, we derive the exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs. We further develop a computationally efficient pipeline to compute the covariance function for these GPs. We then use the resulting GPs to perform Bayesian inference for wide deep neural networks on MNIST and CIFAR-10. We observe that trained neural network accuracy approaches that of the corresponding GP with increasing layer width, and that the GP uncertainty is strongly correlated with trained network prediction error. We further find that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite-width networks. Finally we connect the performance of these GPs to the recent theory of signal propagation in random neural networks.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Bayesian Neural Networks Uncertainty Quantification with Cubature Rules

TL;DR: The proposed approach approximates the first two moments of the posterior distribution of the parameters by propagating cubature points across the network nonlinearities and can achieve more diverse layer-wise uncertainty quantification results of neural networks with a fast convergence rate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bayesian Interpolation with Deep Linear Networks

TL;DR: The authors showed that linear networks make provably optimal predictions at infinite depth with Gaussian weight priors and mean squared error as a negative log-likelihood, and showed that the posterior of infinitely deep linear networks with data-agnostic priors is the same as that of shallow networks with evidence-maximizing data dependent priors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Space of Functions Computed by Deep-Layered Machines

TL;DR: The space of functions computed by random-layered machines, including deep neural networks and Boolean circuits, is characterized and it is shown that the macroscopic entropy of Boolean functions is either monotonically increasing or decreasing with the growing depth.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Using Gaussian Processes with LSTM Neural Networks to Predict Continuous-Time, Dimensional Emotion in Ambiguous Speech

TL;DR: A predictive CER system which combines a model for the emotional content of speech that uses a Gaussian process to define a distribution that incorporates the inherent ambiguity of emotional speech and which combines this model alongside LSTM neural network techniques that have that have previously been shown to perform well on this task.
Journal ArticleDOI

Variational Bayes survival analysis for unemployment modelling

TL;DR: In this article, a deep artificial neural network (ANN) was used as a nonlinear hazard function to predict the probability of a job seeker finding a job as a function of time.
References
More filters
Proceedings Article

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

TL;DR: This work introduces Adam, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions, based on adaptive estimates of lower-order moments, and provides a regret bound on the convergence rate that is comparable to the best known results under the online convex optimization framework.
Book

Bayesian learning for neural networks

TL;DR: Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks shows that Bayesian methods allow complex neural network models to be used without fear of the "overfitting" that can occur with traditional neural network learning methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression

TL;DR: A new unifying view, including all existing proper probabilistic sparse approximations for Gaussian process regression, relies on expressing the effective prior which the methods are using, and highlights the relationship between existing methods.
Journal Article

In Defense of One-Vs-All Classification

TL;DR: It is argued that a simple "one-vs-all" scheme is as accurate as any other approach, assuming that the underlying binary classifiers are well-tuned regularized classifiers such as support vector machines.
Proceedings Article

Gaussian processes for Big data

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce stochastic variational inference for Gaussian process models, which enables the application of Gaussian Process (GP) models to data sets containing millions of data points.