scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings Article

Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processes

TLDR
The exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs is derived and it is found that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite- width networks.
Abstract
It has long been known that a single-layer fully-connected neural network with an i.i.d. prior over its parameters is equivalent to a Gaussian process (GP), in the limit of infinite network width. This correspondence enables exact Bayesian inference for infinite width neural networks on regression tasks by means of evaluating the corresponding GP. Recently, kernel functions which mimic multi-layer random neural networks have been developed, but only outside of a Bayesian framework. As such, previous work has not identified that these kernels can be used as covariance functions for GPs and allow fully Bayesian prediction with a deep neural network. In this work, we derive the exact equivalence between infinitely wide deep networks and GPs. We further develop a computationally efficient pipeline to compute the covariance function for these GPs. We then use the resulting GPs to perform Bayesian inference for wide deep neural networks on MNIST and CIFAR-10. We observe that trained neural network accuracy approaches that of the corresponding GP with increasing layer width, and that the GP uncertainty is strongly correlated with trained network prediction error. We further find that test performance increases as finite-width trained networks are made wider and more similar to a GP, and thus that GP predictions typically outperform those of finite-width networks. Finally we connect the performance of these GPs to the recent theory of signal propagation in random neural networks.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

AutoInit: Automatic Initialization via Jacobian Tuning

Darshil Doshi, +1 more
- 27 Jun 2022 - 
TL;DR: A new and cheap algorithm is introduced, that allows one to have a good initialization automatically, for general feed-forward DNNs, that utilizes the Jacobian between adjacent network blocks to tune the network hyperparameters to criticality.
Posted Content

Centroid Approximation for Bootstrap.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose an efficient method to explicitly optimize a small set of high quality "centroid" points to better approximate the ideal bootstrap distribution, by minimizing a simple objective function that is asymptotically equivalent to the Wasserstein distance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pattern Discovery and Multi-Slot-Ahead Forecast of Network Traffic: A Revisiting to Gaussian Process

TL;DR: In this paper , a Gaussian Process (GP)-based online learning framework is proposed to better understand and predict future network traffic from a Bayesian perspective, which is further encoded into the GP-PConv framework by utilizing a mixture of Gaussian to encode the dominant and several nondominant patterns.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical Guarantees

TL;DR: A principled approach for quantifying variable selection uncertainty by deriving its posterior distribution is provided and it is shown that the approach is generalizable even to non-differentiable models such as tree ensembles.
Journal ArticleDOI

An asynchronous parallel high-throughput model calibration framework for crystal plasticity finite element constitutive models

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors apply a recently developed asynchronous parallel constrained BO algorithm to calibrate phenomenological constitutive models for stainless steel 304 L, Tantalum, and Cantor high-entropy alloy.
References
More filters
Proceedings Article

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

TL;DR: This work introduces Adam, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions, based on adaptive estimates of lower-order moments, and provides a regret bound on the convergence rate that is comparable to the best known results under the online convex optimization framework.
Book

Bayesian learning for neural networks

TL;DR: Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks shows that Bayesian methods allow complex neural network models to be used without fear of the "overfitting" that can occur with traditional neural network learning methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression

TL;DR: A new unifying view, including all existing proper probabilistic sparse approximations for Gaussian process regression, relies on expressing the effective prior which the methods are using, and highlights the relationship between existing methods.
Journal Article

In Defense of One-Vs-All Classification

TL;DR: It is argued that a simple "one-vs-all" scheme is as accurate as any other approach, assuming that the underlying binary classifiers are well-tuned regularized classifiers such as support vector machines.
Proceedings Article

Gaussian processes for Big data

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce stochastic variational inference for Gaussian process models, which enables the application of Gaussian Process (GP) models to data sets containing millions of data points.