scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes.

TLDR
This first step in a regionalSCI research strategy has articulated objectives for further development by the wider SCI research community, and reinforced the importance of coordinated, collective action in optimising outcomes following SCI.
Abstract
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Neuron specific enolase: a promising therapeutic target in acute spinal cord injury.

TL;DR: An overview of the current basic research and clinical studies on the role of multifunctional enolase in neurotrauma is given, with a special emphasis on NSE in acute SCI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional Priorities in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Using Discrete Choice Experiments To Determine Preferences

TL;DR: Preference for normal arm/hand function was found to be significantly more preferred by the group with paraplegia compared with those with tetraplegia, and sexual function had the lowest preference when traded against the other four functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy

TL;DR: The research strategy roadmap and framework informed discussion at a structured stakeholder dialogue meeting of 23 participants representing key SCI research constituencies, results of which are published in a companion paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.

TL;DR: The reviews inform specific research topics and highlight other important research considerations, most notably those pertaining to SCI patients’ perspectives on quality of life, which may be of use in determining meaningful research outcome measures.
References
More filters
BookDOI

Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance

Abstract: Given the increased reliance on teams in many organizational settings, it is critical that all those who are interested in improving training and performance better understand team dynamics. During the past decade, cognitive science has substantially influenced the study of team performance and has helped develop the field of team cognition. The contributors to this volume describe the many ways in which team cognition is being used as an organizing framework to guide research into factors that affect team coordination. Nowadays, team cognition must be considered not only within "conventional" teams, but also across time and space in distributed teams, and - because of increased use of artificial team members (e.g., intelligent agents) - across people and machines. All of these complicating factors are considered, along with methodological issues that surround the process of measuring and defining team cognition. The unique blend of theory and data in this multidisciplinary book will be of value to psychologists and academics interested in cognition and organizational behavior, to team researchers and practitioners in Industry and the military, and to graduate students Interested in group processes and performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials.

TL;DR: It is concluded that underpowered trials are ethical in only 2 situations: small trials of interventions for rare diseases in which investigators document explicit plans for including their results with those of similar trials in a prospective meta-analysis, and early-phase trials in the development of drugs or devices, provided they are adequately powered for defined purposes other than randomized treatment comparisons.
Journal ArticleDOI

The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review

TL;DR: This systematic review examined studies that directly surveyed people with SCI to ascertain their health priorities and life domains of importance to identify functional recovery priorities and health, as well as relationships, emerged as important life domains.
Journal ArticleDOI

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

TL;DR: A checklist for health research priority setting that allows for informed choices on different approaches and outlines nine common themes of good practice is proposed, intended to provide generic assistance for planning health research prioritization processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of research to inform public policymaking.

TL;DR: Systematic reviews can inform public policymaking by providing research-based answers to the best solutions to the most burdensome health problems, the best ways to fit these solutions into complex and often overstretched and underresourced health systems, and the best way to bring about the desired changes in health systems.
Related Papers (5)