scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Diversity and distribution of arthropods in native forests of the Azores archipelago

TLDR
Most of the taxonomic, colonization, and trophic groups analysed showed a significantly left unimodal distribution of species occurrences, with almost all islands, fragments or sites having exclusive species.
Abstract
Since 1999, our knowledge of arthropods in native forests of the Azores has improved greatly. Under the BALA project (Biodiversity of Arthropods of Laurisilva of the Azores), an extensive standardised sampling protocol was employed in most of the native forest cover of the Archipelago. Additionally, in 2003 and 2004, more intensive sampling was carried out in several fragments, resulting in nearly a doubling of the number of samples collected. A total of 6,770 samples from 100 sites distributed amongst 18 fragments of seven islands have been collected, resulting in almost 140,000 specimens having been caught. Overall, 452 arthropod species belonging to Araneae, Opilionida, Pseudoscorpionida, Myriapoda and Insecta (excluding Diptera and Hymenoptera) were recorded. Altogether, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Araneae and Lepidoptera comprised the major proportion of the total diversity (84%) and total abundance (78%) found. Endemic species comprised almost half of the individuals sampled. Most of the taxonomic, colonization, and trophic groups analysed showed a significantly left unimodal distribution of species occurrences, with almost all islands, fragments or sites having exclusive species. Araneae was the only group to show a strong bimodal distribution. Only a third of the species was common to both the canopy and soil, the remaining being equally exclusive to each stratum. Canopy and soil strata showed a strongly distinct species composition, the composition being more similar within the same stratum regardless of the location, than within samples from both strata at the same location. Possible reasons for these findings are explored. The procedures applied in the sampling protocol are also discussed.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them

TL;DR: Seven impediments to invertebrates effective protection are identified and as possible solutions for the public dilemma: better public information and marketing, parataxonomy, citizen science programs and biodiversity informatics are suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates

TL;DR: Evaluating 48 species of Azorean arthropods and Iberian spiders and suggesting possible new criteria that were not considered in the current evaluation framework that could allow a more comprehensive and effective assessment of invertebrates shows that co-extinction could be introduced as an explicit part of the classification process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Extinction debt on oceanic islands

TL;DR: In this article, a method that uses the historical sequence of deforestation in the Azorean Islands, to calculate realistic and ecologically adjusted species-area relationships was used to reveal dramatic and hitherto unrecognized levels of extinction debt, as a result of the extensive destruction of the native forest.
Journal ArticleDOI

Drivers of diversity in Macaronesian spiders and the role of species extinctions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify the biogeographical factors underlying spider species richness in the Macaronesian region and assess the importance of species extinctions in shaping the current diversity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional biogeography of oceanic islands and the scaling of functional diversity in the Azores

TL;DR: Analysis of functional diversity for spiders and beetles in the Azorean archipelago reveals that functional diversity increases with species richness, which, in turn scales with island area regardless of the taxa and distributional group considered (endemics, natives, and exotics).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways

TL;DR: In this paper, a thorough inventory of a tropical rain forest ant fauna and use it to evaluate species richness estimators is reported, which demonstrates that patterns of species occurrence early in an inventory may be inadequate to estimate species richness, but that relatively complete inventories of species-rich arthropod communities are possible if multiple sampling methods and extensive effort are applied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size.

TL;DR: It is concluded that most species richness estimators may be useful in biodiversity studies and a decision framework is proposed to assess which estimator should be used to compare species richness scores of different sites, depending on the grain size of the original data, and of the kind of data available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolution on oceanic islands: molecular phylogenetic approaches to understanding pattern and process.

TL;DR: The development of molecular genetic methods for phylogenetic reconstruction has been a significant advance for evolutionary biologists, providing a tool for answering questions about the diversity among the flora and fauna on such islands as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Possible Method for the Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity

Abstract: Inventories of vertebrate and flowering plants are frequently used as surrogates for estimates of total biodiversity. This is in part because the inclusion of invertebrates and nonflowering plants is perceived as being too time-consuming, costly, and difficult because of the shortage of specialists. Estimates of the species richness of field samples of spiders, ants, polychaetes, and mosses made by a biodiversity technician and by specialist taxonomists were compared. The biodiversity technician received a few hours training in the taxonomy of each group and separated specimens into recognizable taxonomic units (RTUs). The specialists sorted to species. For the three animal groups the biodiversity technician recorded 165 taxa and the specialists 147, with the error for the ants and spiders being 13% or less. A small amount of splitting and lumping of species was detected. The concordance of estimates remained very similar when small subsamples were used. The procedure was repeated by 13 undergraduates using a subsample of spiders. Their average error was 14.4%. The greatest similarity in estimates was for the mosses, but with high levels of splitting and lumping this result was entirely fortuitous. The results suggest that RTU estimates made by biodiversity technicians may be sufficiently close to formal taxonomic estimates of species richness to be useful for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. They also show, however, that the procedures outlined here should be used on invertebrate and nonflowering plant groups before they can be confidently included in biodiversity surveys. Inventarios de vertebrados y de plantas fanerogamas son frecuentemente utilizados como substitutos de estimadores de biodiversidad total. Esto es en parte por que la inclusion de invertebrados y las plantas que no florecen es percibida como consumidora de tiempo, costosa y dificil por la escasez de especialistas. Estimaciones de riqueza de especies de muestras a campo de aranas, hormigas, poliquetos y musgos llevadas a cabo por un tecnico en biodiversidad y un especialista taxonomo fueron comparadas. El tecnico en biodiversidad recibio unas pocas horas de entrenamiento sobre la taxonomia para cada grupo y separo especimenes en Unidades Taxonomicas Reconocibles. El especialista separo por especies. Para los tres grupos de animales el tecnico registro 165 taxa y el especialista 147, con un error para las hormigas y las aranas de un 13% o menos. Se detecto una pequena cantidad de divisiones y de agrupamientos de especies. La concordancia de las estimaciones permanecio casi igual cuando pequenas sub-muestras fueron utilizadas. El procedimiento fue repetido por 13 estudiantes utilizando submuestras de aranas. El error promedio que cometieron fue del 14.4%. La mayor similitud en las estimacione fue para los musgos, sin embargo, con los altos niveles de division y agrupamiento estos resultados fueron enteramente fortuitos. Los resultados sugieren que las estimaciones de las unidades taxonomicas reconocibles realizadas por tecnicos en biodiversidad resultan lo suficientemente cercanas a las estimaciones taxonomicas formales para la riqueza de especies, por lo que son utiles para una rapida estimacion de biodiversidad. Sin embargo, estas tambien muestran que los procedimientos discutidos aqui deben ser utilizados en invertebrados y plantas que no florecen antes de que sean incluidos con confianza en los relevamientos de biodiversidad.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parataxonomy vs. taxonomy in biodiversity studies - pitfalls and applicability of 'morphospecies' sorting

TL;DR: PUs are useless for inventories and area selection in conservation evaluation, biogeographical and autecological studies; they provide only uncertain data for studies in species turnover and overlap, but they can be used quite reliably for global comparisons of gross species richness, non-comparable descriptions of species richness of single sites or for comparisons of sites without species overlap.
Related Papers (5)