scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Effects of Different Types of Front-of-Pack Labelling Information on the Healthiness of Food Purchases-A Randomised Controlled Trial.

TLDR
These real-world data align with experimental findings and provide support for the policy choice of HSR, and recommendation/warning labels warrant further exploration, as they may be a stronger driver of healthy food purchases.
Abstract
Background: Front-of-pack nutrition labelling may support healthier packaged food purchases. Australia has adopted a novel Health Star Rating (HSR) system, but the legitimacy of this choice is unknown. Objective: To define the effects of different formats of front-of-pack labelling on the healthiness of food purchases and consumer perceptions. Design: Individuals were assigned at random to access one of four different formats of nutrition labelling—HSR, multiple traffic light labels (MTL), daily intake guides (DIG), recommendations/warnings (WARN)—or control (the nutrition information panel, NIP). Participants accessed nutrition information by using a smartphone application to scan the bar-codes of packaged foods, while shopping. The primary outcome was healthiness defined by the mean transformed nutrient profile score of packaged foods that were purchased over four weeks. Results: The 1578 participants, mean age 38 years, 84% female recorded purchases of 148,727 evaluable food items. The mean healthiness of the purchases in the HSR group was non-inferior to MTL, DIG, or WARN (all p 0.07), but WARN resulted in healthier packaged food purchases (mean difference 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.72; p = 0.04). HSR was perceived by participants as more useful than DIG, and easier to understand than MTL or DIG (all p < 0.05). Participants also reported the HSR to be easier to understand, and the HSR and MTL to be more useful, than NIP (all p < 0.03). Conclusions: These real-world data align with experimental findings and provide support for the policy choice of HSR. Recommendation/warning labels warrant further exploration, as they may be a stronger driver of healthy food purchases.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental Studies of Front-of-Package Nutrient Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Ultra-Processed Foods: A Scoping Review

TL;DR: FoP nutrient warnings were visually attended to by consumers, easy to understand, helped consumers identify products high in nutrients of concern, and discouraged them from purchasing these products, although other labeling systems were perceived as containing more information and performed better at helping consumers rank the healthfulness of products.
Journal ArticleDOI

Front of pack nutritional labelling schemes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence relating to objectively measured consumption and purchasing.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided from experimental and 'real-life' studies indicating that FOPL encourages healthier food purchasing, resulting in healthier purchasing in ITS studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Front-of-pack nutrition labelling to promote healthier diets: current practice and opportunities to strengthen regulation worldwide.

TL;DR: Key components of 31 FOP nutrition labelling regulations endorsed by governments up to June 2019 are evaluated to support policymakers to design and implement best-practice, evidence-informed regulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of warning labels on sugar-sweetened beverages on parental selection: An online experimental study.

TL;DR: Installing image-based warning labels discourage SSB selection by parents for their children, and field studies are needed to assess the impact of SSB warning labels in real-life settings.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels

TL;DR: Research conducted in 2003–2006 in the EU-15 countries on how consumers perceive, understand, like and use nutrition information on food labels is reviewed to provide new insights into consumer liking and understanding of simplified front of pack signposting formats.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review

TL;DR: The evidence indicates that the impact of health warnings depends upon their size and design: whereas obscure text-only warnings appear to have little impact, prominent health warnings on the face of packages serve as a prominent source of health information for smokers and non-smokers, can increase health knowledge and perceptions of risk and can promote smoking cessation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods are a cost-effective population-level intervention with unparalleled reach, however, governments will need to explore new formats and different types of information content to ensure that nutrition information is accessible and understandable.
Journal ArticleDOI

UN High-Level Meeting on Non-Communicable Diseases: addressing four questions

TL;DR: The realities of the situation are presented by answering four questions: is there really a global crisis of NCDs; how is NCD a development issue; are affordable and cost-effective interventions available; and do the authors really need high-level leadership and accountability?
Related Papers (5)