Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, and quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics.Abstract:
Assessing the success of ecological restoration projects is critical to justify the use of restoration in natural resource management and to improve best practice. Although there are extensive discussions surrounding the characteristics that define and measure successful restoration, monitoring or evaluation of projects in practice is widely thought to have lagged behind. We conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. We searched the Web of Knowledge plus two additional restoration journals not found in the database for empirical papers that assessed restoration projects post-implementation. We quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics. Encouragingly, we found the number of empirical evaluations has grown substantially in recent years. The increased age of restoration projects and number of papers that assessed ecological functions since previous reviews of the literature is also a positive development. Research is still heavily skewed toward United States and Australia, however, and identifying an appropriate reference site needs further investigation. Of particular concern is the dearth of papers identified in the literature search that included any measure of socioeconomic attributes. Focusing future empirical research on quantifying ecosystem services and other socioeconomic outcomes is essential for understanding the full benefits and costs of ecological restoration and to support its use in natural resource management.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Gaps and limitations in the use of restoration scenarios: a review
André Luis Acosta,Francisco d'Albertas,Melina de Souza Leite,Antonio Mauro Saraiva,Jean Paul Metzger +4 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation on soil bioengineering measures in agricultural areas: poorer durability of wooden structures and better aboveground habitat improvements.
Zhenxing Zhang,Cao Lina,Ziyu Zhu,Chunguang He,Hongyong Xiang,Xu Liang,Caiyun Sun,Lin Chenlu,Haijun Yang,Kun Li +9 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of time (restoration ages), structural forms and structural parameters (materials and construction standards) on wooden structural durability and aboveground habitat improvements using soil bioengineering measures in agricultural areas was evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI
The long-term recovery of a moderately fertilised semi-natural grassland
TL;DR: On that basis, intensification of SNG management cannot be advocated for conventional agricultural or bioeconomy purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Recovery of Basalt Substrate for Xeric Scrub Restoration in a Lava Field in Mexico City
TL;DR: The Pedregal de San Angel Ecological Reserve (PSAER) protects important remnants of a unique type of xeric scrub in a lava field embedded in Mexico City.
Journal ArticleDOI
The cumulative effects assessment of a coastal ecological restoration project in China: An integrated perspective
TL;DR: The need to comprehensively consider ecological effects of SDADO projects in the planning stage is highlighted, and an integrative assessment method combining cumulative effects of hydrodynamic conditions, water quality and biological factors is highlighted.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Bradley J. Cardinale,J. Emmett Duffy,Andrew Gonzalez,David U. Hooper,Charles Perrings,Patrick Venail,Anita Narwani,Georgina M. Mace,David Tilman,David A. Wardle,Ann P. Kinzig,Gretchen C. Daily,Michel Loreau,James B. Grace,Anne Larigauderie,Diane S. Srivastava,Shahid Naeem +16 more
TL;DR: It is argued that human actions are dismantling the Earth’s ecosystems, eliminating genes, species and biological traits at an alarming rate, and the question of how such loss of biological diversity will alter the functioning of ecosystems and their ability to provide society with the goods and services needed to prosper is asked.
Journal ArticleDOI
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
TL;DR: The three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin are expanded into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic.
Journal ArticleDOI
Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.
TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 89 restoration assessments in a wide range of ecosystem types across the globe indicates that ecological restoration increased provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services by 44 and 25%, respectively, however, values of both remained lower in restored versus intact reference ecosystems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology
Richard J. Hobbs,David A. Norton +1 more
TL;DR: This work stresses the importance of developing restoration methodologies that are applicable at the landscape scale, beyond nonquantitative generalities about size and connectivity, so that urgent large-scale restoration can be planned and implemented effectively.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology
TL;DR: Practical restoration efforts should rely heavily on what is known from theoretical and empirical research on how communities develop and are structured over time, and are identified specific areas that are in critical need of further research to advance the science of restoration ecology.