scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature

Liana Wortley, +2 more
- 01 Sep 2013 - 
- Vol. 21, Iss: 5, pp 537-543
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, and quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics.
Abstract
Assessing the success of ecological restoration projects is critical to justify the use of restoration in natural resource management and to improve best practice. Although there are extensive discussions surrounding the characteristics that define and measure successful restoration, monitoring or evaluation of projects in practice is widely thought to have lagged behind. We conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. We searched the Web of Knowledge plus two additional restoration journals not found in the database for empirical papers that assessed restoration projects post-implementation. We quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics. Encouragingly, we found the number of empirical evaluations has grown substantially in recent years. The increased age of restoration projects and number of papers that assessed ecological functions since previous reviews of the literature is also a positive development. Research is still heavily skewed toward United States and Australia, however, and identifying an appropriate reference site needs further investigation. Of particular concern is the dearth of papers identified in the literature search that included any measure of socioeconomic attributes. Focusing future empirical research on quantifying ecosystem services and other socioeconomic outcomes is essential for understanding the full benefits and costs of ecological restoration and to support its use in natural resource management.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape‐scale dispersal

TL;DR: The linkages between landscape-scale dispersal of plants and the recovery of species richness and genetic diversity of plants during habitat restoration is reviewed and recommendations for restoration planners and practitioners to consider while aiming to restore self-sustainable ecosystems with high species- and gene-level biodiversity are proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Forest landscape restoration - What generates failure and success?

TL;DR: In this paper, a global online survey was conducted to identify common obstacles and success factors for the implementation of forest restoration, including lack of local stakeholder involvement, mismatch between goals of local communities and restoration managers, as well as environmental, anthropogenic, and technical barriers to tree regeneration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do nest boxes in restored woodlands promote the conservation of hollow-dependent fauna?

TL;DR: Nest boxes in restored woodlands are used by some hollow-dependent fauna but principally already common species and not taxa of conservation concern, and Nest boxes were also used by pest species.
Journal ArticleDOI

Marine ecosystem restoration and biodiversity offset

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the relevance of marine ecosystem restoration in meeting offset requirements and clarified the different levels of equivalence that should be met when designing offsets relying on restoration techniques.
Book ChapterDOI

Effective River Restoration in the 21st Century: From Trial and Error to Novel Evidence-Based Approaches

TL;DR: It is concluded that river restorations conducted up until now have had highly variable effects with, on balance, more positives than negatives and there has been a focus on form rather than processes and functioning in river restoration, which has truncated the evolution of geomorphic features and any dynamic interaction with biota.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach

TL;DR: The three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin are expanded into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 89 restoration assessments in a wide range of ecosystem types across the globe indicates that ecological restoration increased provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services by 44 and 25%, respectively, however, values of both remained lower in restored versus intact reference ecosystems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology

TL;DR: This work stresses the importance of developing restoration methodologies that are applicable at the landscape scale, beyond nonquantitative generalities about size and connectivity, so that urgent large-scale restoration can be planned and implemented effectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology

TL;DR: Practical restoration efforts should rely heavily on what is known from theoretical and empirical research on how communities develop and are structured over time, and are identified specific areas that are in critical need of further research to advance the science of restoration ecology.
Related Papers (5)