scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature

Liana Wortley, +2 more
- 01 Sep 2013 - 
- Vol. 21, Iss: 5, pp 537-543
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, and quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics.
Abstract
Assessing the success of ecological restoration projects is critical to justify the use of restoration in natural resource management and to improve best practice. Although there are extensive discussions surrounding the characteristics that define and measure successful restoration, monitoring or evaluation of projects in practice is widely thought to have lagged behind. We conducted a literature review to determine trends in evaluations of restoration projects and identify key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. We searched the Web of Knowledge plus two additional restoration journals not found in the database for empirical papers that assessed restoration projects post-implementation. We quantified the extent that key attributes of success, including ecological (vegetation structure, species diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning) and socioeconomic, were addressed by these papers along with trends in publication and restoration characteristics. Encouragingly, we found the number of empirical evaluations has grown substantially in recent years. The increased age of restoration projects and number of papers that assessed ecological functions since previous reviews of the literature is also a positive development. Research is still heavily skewed toward United States and Australia, however, and identifying an appropriate reference site needs further investigation. Of particular concern is the dearth of papers identified in the literature search that included any measure of socioeconomic attributes. Focusing future empirical research on quantifying ecosystem services and other socioeconomic outcomes is essential for understanding the full benefits and costs of ecological restoration and to support its use in natural resource management.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Natural regeneration and biodiversity: a global meta‐analysis and implications for spatial planning

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted a meta-analysis for tropical regions and quantified the relationships between both ecological and socioeconomic factors and biodiversity responses in naturally regenerating areas, and showed that natural regeneration was predominantly reported within: the Neotropical realm; areas that were intensively disturbed; and countries with medium HDI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Challenges for Restoration of Coastal Marine Ecosystems in the Anthropocene

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify four major challenges for the future development and implementation of coastal marine ecosystem restoration (MER): (1) development of more effective, scalable restoration tools, (2) adaptation of restoration tools to cope with climate change and global stressors, (3) integration of social and ecological restoration priorities, and (4) promotion of the perception and use of coastal MER as a scientifically credible management approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wind-driven water level fluctuations drive marsh edge erosion variability in microtidal coastal bays.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate marsh edge erosion in a small (~3 km2) bay within Barataria Bay, LA, USA and show that, for the same wave power, north-facing marsh edges erode twice as fast as south-facing edges.
Journal ArticleDOI

Active versus passive restoration: Recovery of cloud forest structure, diversity and soil condition in abandoned pastures

TL;DR: In this paper, the effectiveness of active and passive forest restoration was compared in pastures with 21 years of exclosure, and compared these to a mature cloud forest (reference system), in eastern Mexico.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach

TL;DR: The three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin are expanded into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 89 restoration assessments in a wide range of ecosystem types across the globe indicates that ecological restoration increased provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services by 44 and 25%, respectively, however, values of both remained lower in restored versus intact reference ecosystems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology

TL;DR: This work stresses the importance of developing restoration methodologies that are applicable at the landscape scale, beyond nonquantitative generalities about size and connectivity, so that urgent large-scale restoration can be planned and implemented effectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology

TL;DR: Practical restoration efforts should rely heavily on what is known from theoretical and empirical research on how communities develop and are structured over time, and are identified specific areas that are in critical need of further research to advance the science of restoration ecology.
Related Papers (5)