Open AccessBook
Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective.
TLDR
Pawson as discussed by the authors examines the recent spread of evidence-based policy making across the Western world, and presents a devastating critique of the dominant approach to systematic review - namely the "meta-analytic" approach as sponsored by the Cochrane and Campbell collaborations.Abstract:
Ray Pawson examines the recent spread of evidence-based policy making across the Western world. Few major public initiatives are mounted these days in the absence of a sustained attempt to evaluate them. Programs are tried, tried, and tried again and researched, researched, and researched again. And yet it is often difficult to know which interventions, and which inquiries, will withstand the test of time. The evident solution, going by the name of evidence-based policy, is to take the longer view. Rather than relying on one-off studies, it is wiser to look to the 'weight of evidence'. Accordingly, it is now widely agreed the most useful data to support policy decisions will be culled from systematic reviews of all the existing research in particular policy domains. This is the consensual starting point for Ray Pawson's latest foray into the world of evaluative research. But this is social science after all and harmony prevails only in the first chapter. Thereafter,
Pawson presents a devastating critique of the dominant approach to systematic review - namely the 'meta-analytic' approach as sponsored by the Cochrane and Campbell collaborations. In its place is commended an approach that he terms 'realist synthesis'. On this vision, the real purpose of systematic review is better to understand program theory, so that policies can be properly targeted and developed to counter an ever-changing landscape of social problems. The book will be essential reading for all those who loved (or loathed) the arguments developed in Realistic Evaluation (Sage, 1997). It offers a complete blueprint for research synthesis, supported by detailed illustrations and worked examples from across the policy waterfront. It will be of especial interest to policy-makers, practitioners, researchers and students working in health, education, employment, social care, criminal justice, regeneration, and welfare.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations
Markus Perkmann,Valentina Tartari,Maureen McKelvey,Erkko Autio,Erkko Autio,Anders Broström,Pablo D'Este,Riccardo Fini,Riccardo Fini,Aldo Geuna,Rosa Grimaldi,Alan Hughes,Michael Kitson,Stefan Krabel,Patrick Llerena,Francesco Lissoni,Francesco Lissoni,Ammon Salter,Maurizio Sobrero +18 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a systematic review of research on academic scientists' involvement in collaborative research, contract research, consulting and informal relationships for university-industry knowledge transfer, which they refer as academic engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Academic engagement and commercialisation : A review of the literature on university-industry relations
Markus Perkmann,Valentina Tartari,Maureen McKelvey,Erkko Autio,Anders Broström,Pablo D'Este,Riccardo Fini,Aldo Geuna,Aldo Geuna,Rosa Grimaldi,Alan Hughes,Stefan Krabel,Michael Kitson,Patrick Llerena,Franceso Lissoni,Ammon Salter,Maurizio Sobrero +16 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a systematic review of research on academic scientists' involvement in collaborative research, contract research, consulting and informal relationships for university-industry knowledge transfer, which they refer as academic engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI
A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009
TL;DR: This article reviews and critically evaluates historical and contemporary research on simulation‐based medical education (SBME) and presents and discusses 12 features and best practices that teachers should know in order to use medical simulation technology to maximum educational benefit.
Journal ArticleDOI
Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis
TL;DR: In this article, the adaptability of purposeful sampling strategies to the process of qualitative research synthesis is examined, and the authors make a unique contribution to the literature by examining how different sampling strategies might be particularly suited to constructing multi-perspectival, emancipatory, participatory and deconstructive interpretations of published research.