Journal ArticleDOI
Evolution of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method.
TLDR
This review focuses on the extra steps in sample preparation for application of DLLME in different matrixes such as food, biological fluids and solid samples and its applications in conjunction with different extraction techniques such as solid-phase extraction, solidification of floating organic drop and supercritical fluid extraction are summarized.About:
This article is published in Journal of Chromatography A.The article was published on 2010-04-16. It has received 851 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Solid phase extraction & Supercritical fluid extraction.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Mycotoxins in cereals and related foodstuffs: A review on occurrence and recent methods of analysis
TL;DR: For the first time a review is done about mycotoxins occurrence in cereals and derived products published in the last years, together with the recent improvements regarding methods for their quantification.
Journal ArticleDOI
Green aspects, developments and perspectives of liquid phase microextraction techniques.
TL;DR: The possible use of novel, non-toxic extracting agents, inter alia, ionic liquids, coacervates, surfactant solutions and reverse micelles in the liquid phase microextraction techniques has been evaluated in depth.
Journal ArticleDOI
Recent advances in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using organic solvents lighter than water. A review
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of some of the most interesting solutions published recently, those which could possibly expand the applicability of Dispersive Liquid Liquid Micro Extraction (DLLME).
Journal ArticleDOI
Ionic liquids in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction
TL;DR: In this article, the most recent analytical developments aimed at employing Ionic liquids (ILs) in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) are summarized.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes
Antonio V. Herrera-Herrera,María Asensio-Ramos,Javier Hernández-Borges,Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Delgado +3 more
TL;DR: A review of applications of liquid liquid microextraction (DLLME) for organic analytes can be found in this paper, focusing on applications of DLLME for extracting organic analyte (e.g., pesticides, pharmaceuticals, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers
Journal ArticleDOI
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction
Mohammad Rezaee,Yaghoub Assadi,Mohammad Reza Milani Hosseini,Elham Aghaee,Fardin Ahmadi,Sana Berijani +5 more
TL;DR: The ability of DLLME technique in the extraction of other organic compounds such as organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides and substituted benzene compounds were studied.
Journal ArticleDOI
Solvent microextraction into a single drop.
TL;DR: An analytical technique is described which combines solvent extraction with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in a simple and inexpensive apparatus involving very little solvent consumption and is in good agreement with a convective-diffusive kinetic model.
Journal ArticleDOI
Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction for sample preparation of biological fluids prior to capillary electrophoresis.
TL;DR: Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME) served as a technique for sample cleanup since large molecules, acidic compounds, and neutral components were not extracted into the acceptor phase.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-flame photometric detection. Very simple, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water
TL;DR: Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries were high and ranged between 789-1070 and 78.9-107%, respectively, while the linear range was wide and limit of detections were very low and were between 3 to 20 pg/mL for most of the analytes.