scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: a meta-analysis

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine if muscle measures are predictive of ADL and IADL in older populations and found that low muscle mass was positively associated with ADL dependency in 5/9 articles and 5/5 for IADl dependency.
Journal Article

Defining sarcopenia: the impact of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of sarcopenia in a large middle aged cohort

TL;DR: It is concluded that the prevalence of sarcopenia is highly dependent on the applied diagnostic criteria and it is necessary to reach a consensus on the definition of sarc Openia in order to make studies comparable and for implementation in clinical care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in individuals with CVD, dementia, diabetes mellitus and respiratory disease and is stratified by disease, definition of sarcopenia and continent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults

TL;DR: In this article , a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression were performed to determine if increasing daily protein ingestion contributes to gaining lean body mass (LBM), muscle strength, and physical/functional test performance in healthy subjects.

Cancer and Chemotherapy Contribute to Muscle Loss by Activating Common Signaling Pathways

TL;DR: The results suggest that both cancer and chemotherapy contribute to muscle loss by activating common signaling pathways, and the undertaking of combination strategies that aim to both counteract tumor growth and reduce chemotherapy side effects are supported.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Related Papers (5)